Teams

Bainbridge/Powell

2026 Flint River USTA Adult 40 & Over - Spring · Women 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.42 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-04-14vs Camilla/BushWon 20
W#1 DoublesLeigh Cooper / Niki Cox vs Michele Rumbaugh / Patty Lee4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJoan Overman / Karan Barber vs Lee Lemay / LaDonna Delk6-2, 6-4
2026-04-07vs Camilla/BushWon 10
W#1 DoublesLeigh Cooper / Niki Cox vs April Bush / Michele Rumbaugh6-4, 6-2
2026-03-31vs Thomasville/ParkerSplit 11
L#2 DoublesSheila Edwards / Niki Cox vs Sherry Cady / Tracey Cohen6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKaran Barber / Joan Overman vs Elaine Rudd / Susan Goodwin7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2026-03-28vs Albany/CurtisWon 20
W#1 DoublesLeigh Cooper / Niki Cox vs Jane Gray / Milagros Finch6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSusie Hartzog / Joan Overman vs Layne Cox / Joan Lake6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2026-03-24Won 10
W#1 DoublesNiki Cox / Leigh Cooper vs Catherine Cooper / Sherry Cady6-2, 6-4
2026-03-21vs Albany/CurtisLost 01
L#1 DoublesCarol Heard / Joan Overman vs Milagros Finch / Jane Gray1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Leigh Cooper
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Niki Cox
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.35
Susie Hartzog
published
3.29
Joan Overman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.26
Karan Barber
published
3.22
Sheryl Cannington
published
3.20
Carie Crowley
published 3.5
3.07
April Powell
published 3.5
2.90
Carol Heard
published 3.5
2.80
Babs Coyle
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leigh Cooper + Niki Cox8156% games−3.1% vs expected
Leigh Cooper + Carie Crowley213 matchesnot enough data
Leigh Cooper + Joan Overman123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leigh Cooper
38W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Niki Cox
51W–37L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
3.37
Susie Hartzog
6W–1L career · no lines in 2026
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
Joan Overman
32W–34L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
Karan Barber
11W–22L career · no lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
Sheryl Cannington
2W–2L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Carie Crowley
16W–22L career · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
April Powell
5W–10L career · no lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.07
3.5
Carol Heard
0W–5L career · no lines in 2026
75%25%<1%
2.90
3
Babs Coyle
9W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.