Teams

BH - Burke

USTA Adult League Singles Invitational · 4.0 Women FULL

6 players · average NTRP / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 Women FULL have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Kirstie Ivey
published
3.81
Maloree McDonough
published
3.68
Jennifer Hemstreet
published
3.48
Jamie Burke
published
3.27
Shannon Rodgers
published
Stephanie Heckler
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maloree McDonough + Shannon Rodgers123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kirstie Ivey
79W–39L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%23%
3.90
Maloree McDonough
31W–15L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.81
Jennifer Hemstreet
19W–15L career · no lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.68
Jamie Burke
26W–60L career · no lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
3.48
Shannon Rodgers
19W–30L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Stephanie Heckler
2W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.