Teams

Rose Valley Smasholinis

Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women DelChes - Thur

18 players · average NTRP 2.78 / PHILADELPHIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-11vs Smart AcesLost 23
L#1 DoublesMandy Muller / Erin Stancill vs Joanne Torrillo / Libby Beri1-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesKerry McGovern vs Kate Eby6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBecca Brendler / Gabrielle Rinaldi vs Mona Kumar / Roberta Nurse6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCourtney Dirks / Lori Sheehan vs Nicole Howarth / Ali Glickman2-6, 2-6
W#4 DoublesEmily Glowacki / Ellen Merwin vs Annamaria Jaskot / Julia Centafont6-4, 6-1
2026-06-04vs Party at the NetLost 23
L#1 DoublesErin Stancill / Victoria Young vs Megan Strobridge / Stacey Godsey6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKerry McGovern vs Jodi Esslinger6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesNancy Curtis / Mariana Sorensen vs Jill Dzien / Leslie Montana6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesEllen Merwin / Emily Glowacki vs Vanessa Rossin / Maureen Engle3-6, 1-6
W#4 DoublesTomoko Sakomura / Courtney Dirks vs Erin Mormile / Lisa Canavarro6-1, 6-3
2026-05-28vs Slice Girls POLost 23
W#1 DoublesBecca Brendler / Mandy Muller vs Lauren Lazzati / Erica Berstein2-6, 5-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTomoko Sakomura vs Nancy Kim2-6, 4-5
L#2 DoublesNancy Curtis / Gabrielle Rinaldi vs Sara Free / Kate Miller3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJill Briggs / Erin Stancill vs Shelly Bajaj / Rebecca Gupta6-7, 2-0, 1-0
L#4 DoublesDee Patel / Emily Glowacki vs Ashley Darlington / Jaime Weisbrot1-6, 1-6
2026-05-21vs Mood SwingsWon 32
W#1 DoublesKathryn Boland / Victoria Young vs Tina Mahoney / Susan Graydon6-4, 1-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLori Sheehan vs Julianne Mustain6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMandy Muller / Becca Brendler vs Kate Handling / Sarah Sachinis6-7, 2-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKerry McGovern / Nancy Curtis vs Jesenia Romero-rose / Jeanine Rosenstein6-7, 1-2
W#4 DoublesErin Stancill / Jill Briggs vs Gina Colley-Holgate / Suzanne Kane7-5, 3-2
2026-05-07vs WCC Hit HappensLost 23
L#1 DoublesMandy Muller / Becca Brendler vs Ondraya Brancato / Linda Quereau2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesTomoko Sakomura vs Rachel Smith6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesEllen Merwin / Jill Briggs vs Lauren Maglietta / Erin Salinger4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGabrielle Rinaldi / Mariana Sorensen vs Meredith Rovine / Cameron Prevost2-6, 3-6
L#4 DoublesCheryl Harner / Emily Glowacki vs Carrie Goldkamp / Lena Huelsman2-6, 0-6
2026-04-30vs Chester ValleyLost 23
W#1 DoublesKathryn Boland / Victoria Young vs Betsy Barron / Kelly McDaniel6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesTomoko Sakomura vs Kristina Cabel3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMandy Muller / Becca Brendler vs Amy Kieft / Jill Conwell6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesCheryl Harner / Lori Sheehan vs Amanda Cortes / Kirsten Kane5-7, 3-6
L#4 DoublesEmily Glowacki / Gabrielle Rinaldi vs Bethanie Spangler / Chris Siaton3-6, 3-6
2026-04-23vs Ladies of the DamWon 41
W#1 DoublesKathryn Boland / Victoria Young vs Susie Geib / Jennifer Lara7-6, 6-2
L#1 SinglesTomoko Sakomura vs Nicole Brigham6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMandy Muller / Becca Brendler vs Bryn Arata / Heather Burton2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKerry McGovern / Cheryl Harner vs Bridget Elliott / Lindsey Hellberg4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#4 DoublesEmily Glowacki / Dee Patel vs Tara Donnelly / Anne Holiday6-2, 6-3
2026-04-16vs WhitfordWon 21
W#1 DoublesKathryn Boland / Victoria Young vs Catherine Krauss / Kate Steimel6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMandy Muller / Becca Brendler vs Stephanie Gersbach / Teri Gabrys6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJoan OConnor / Jill Briggs vs Jill Hanawalt / Kerry Lundmark4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings13 teams · 3.0 Women DelChes - Thur
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Slice Girls UMLY08251530289
2Acehats08281233299
3Slice Girls PO08251537281
4Merion Crickets08221839323
5Chester Valley08221840329
6WCC Hit Happens08241641339
7Legacy Lionesses08221842345
8DVTA Perfectly Matched08231744317
9Rose Valley Smasholinis08211944331
10Radnor Valley HPTA08192145353
11Whitford08122857387
12Conestoga Lob Stars0883266438
13Ladies of the Dam0883267427

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.61 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Kathryn Boland
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.88
Becca Brendler
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.76
Mandy Muller
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
2.76
Tomoko Sakomura
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #4 Doubles 20% · published
2.75
Kerry McGovern
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.69
Courtney Dirks
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.69
Nancy Curtis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.60
Erin Stancill
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.48
Gabrielle Rinaldi
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.42
Ellen Merwin
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 2.5
2.36
Lori Sheehan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.28
Emily Glowacki
usually #4 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 2.5
Dee Patel
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.20
Cheryl Harner
usually #1 Singles 29%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 2.5
Jill Briggs
published
Joan OConnor
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mariana Sorensen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Victoria Young
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathryn Boland + Becca Brendler6067% games+20.8% vs expected
Ellen Merwin + Cheryl Harner4361% games+7.9% vs expected
Ellen Merwin + Lori Sheehan3260% games+2.4% vs expected
Mandy Muller + Kathryn Boland151648% games+2.3% vs expected
Mandy Muller + Becca Brendler121049% games+0.6% vs expected
Erin Stancill + Mandy Muller6748% games+0.4% vs expected
Mandy Muller + Gabrielle Rinaldi2446% games+0.2% vs expected
Erin Stancill + Gabrielle Rinaldi2339% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Kathryn Boland
100W–93L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.01
3
Becca Brendler
41W–44L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.88
Mandy Muller
82W–110L career · 8 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76
Tomoko Sakomura
10W–29L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76
Kerry McGovern
11W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%3%97%
2.75
3
Courtney Dirks
5W–6L career · type D · 6 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
2.69
Nancy Curtis
16W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Erin Stancill
40W–43L career · 4 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
2.60
3
Gabrielle Rinaldi
14W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
2.48
2.5
Ellen Merwin
18W–14L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%73%27%
2.42
Lori Sheehan
11W–9L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%86%14%
2.36
2.5
Emily Glowacki
25W–32L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.28
2.5
Dee Patel
18W–30L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Cheryl Harner
20W–37L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.20
Jill Briggs
23W–10L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Joan OConnor
28W–32L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Mariana Sorensen
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Victoria Young
23W–11L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.