Teams

Toups-3.0W-PB

2026 Team Singles Tournament-PB · 3.0 W

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-03-01vs Matthews-3.0W-GCLost 12
L#1 SinglesKelly Rounsaville vs Kara Blevins5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 SinglesSarah Bolton vs Taylor Leatherwood6-4, 6-3
L#3 SinglesCandace Baye vs Stacey Rishel3-6, 1-6
2026-03-01vs Hamrick-3.0W-DeltaWon 30
W#1 SinglesNicole Toups vs Mikki Respess6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesAshley Vance vs Allison Brady7-6, 6-2
W#3 SinglesChelle Langford vs Haley Hamrick6-2, 6-4
2026-02-28vs Haiying-3.0-W-JXNLost 12
L#1 SinglesSarah Bolton vs Alexis Crews0-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesCandace Baye vs Maggie Wei0-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesAshley Vance vs Alyssa Taylor6-4, 6-2
2026-02-28vs Upshaw-3.0W-SWWon 21
L#1 SinglesKelly Rounsaville vs Theresa Cole7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesNicole Toups vs Kay Ketchings7-5, 6-3
W#3 SinglesAshley Vance vs Bonita Upshaw6-2, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 3.0 W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Haiying-3.0-W-JXN4093653
2Matthews-3.0W-GC3184980
3Toups-3.0W-PB227511105
4Hamrick-3.0W-Delta133920132
5Upshaw-3.0W-SW043921137

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.93
Nicole Toups
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.85
Kelly Rounsaville
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.74
Sarah Bolton
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.74
Ashley Vance
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.72
Candace Baye
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
2.64
Chelle Langford
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nicole Toups + Ashley Vance4163% games+9.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nicole Toups
37W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.93
Kelly Rounsaville
30W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%1%99%
2.85
Sarah Bolton
37W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%4%96%
2.74
3
Ashley Vance
48W–29L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Candace Baye
33W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Chelle Langford
41W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
16%83%<1%
2.64

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.