Teams

Almond/DV/Foothills

2025 Foothills Mixed Doubles - 55 & over · 4.0 Mixed Doubles

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-09vs Tonks/Pebble Creek/FoothillsWon 10
W#3 DoublesMark Bailey / Kendra Gould vs Connie Kleeves / Mark Ervin6-1, 6-2
2025-07-26vs Southern/Swisher/55&OverMixed8.0Split 11
W#1 DoublesDavid Sprague / Mary Sheryl Horine vs Russell Woy / Helen Woy0-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJohn Johnston / Kendra Gould vs Mary Marvin / Aaron Swisher1-6, 2-6
2025-07-19vs Tonks/Pebble Creek/FoothillsWon 20
W#1 DoublesLee Brodeur / Carol Almond vs William Lewis / Charlotte Hartman6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDavid Sprague / Kendra Gould vs Connie Kleeves / Mike Kleeves6-3, 6-0
2025-07-12vs Southern/Swisher/55&OverMixed8.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesLee Brodeur / Lindsey Linker vs Jim Heisler / Alisa Crooks5-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesDavid Sprague / Carol Almond vs Bo Lewis / Jeanne Ann Lewis6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesPhilip Borneman / Mary Sheryl Horine vs Aaron Swisher / Robin Szalanski4-6, 1-6
2025-06-23vs Tonks/Pebble Creek/FoothillsWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarol Almond / David Sprague vs Charlotte Hartman / Duane Mozingo6-0, 6-1
2025-06-07vs Southern/Swisher/55&OverMixed8.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMary Sheryl Horine / Lee Brodeur vs Russell Woy / Helen Woy2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKendra Gould / Logan Freeman vs Aaron Swisher / Jenette Swisher1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Mary Sheryl Horine
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.89
Lee Brodeur
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.86
David Sprague
published 4
3.84
Carol Almond
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.81
Tish Wissel
published
3.65
Kendra Gould
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.58
Logan Freeman
published
2.93
Mark Bailey
published
Lindsey Linker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carol Almond + Lee Brodeur213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Mary Sheryl Horine
71W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
4.00
4
Lee Brodeur
63W–33L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.89
4
David Sprague
14W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.86
4
Carol Almond
117W–59L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%87%13%
3.84
Tish Wissel
9W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.81
4
Kendra Gould
51W–37L career · 4 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
Logan Freeman
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.58
Mark Bailey
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
2.93
Lindsey Linker
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.