Teams

Weaver Singles CCL

2026 South East Tennis Singles 40 & Over League · 3.0 Women 40 & Over

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-02-26vs RussellWon 20
W#1 SinglesPeyton Earey vs Laurie Eskew6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesSeanna Morgan vs Katie Ragan6-3, 6-2
2026-02-18vs Pierson 40 singlesLost 12
L#1 SinglesAmy Gibbons vs Katherine Sullivan4-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesAlison Boswell vs Kelly Cole1-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesHannah Bodemann vs Tracy Pierson7-6, 7-5
2026-02-18vs DrennanLost 02
L#1 SinglesAmy Gibbons vs Patricia Furbay1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesHannah Bodemann vs Heather Martin1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-02-10vs GainerLost 02
L#1 SinglesDonna Waller vs Elizabeth Borges2-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesLezlie Bermudez vs Diane Byrd2-6, 2-6
2026-01-23vs MacLeanWon 30
W#1 SinglesPamela Dieffenbauch vs Lauren Hollett-Mott6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesSeanna Morgan vs Beth Saile6-1, 6-1
W#3 SinglesPeyton Earey vs Emily Mussell6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 3.0 Women 40 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Pierson 40 singles60162696
2Drennan5112614127
3Weaver Singles CCL3310816132
4McCain 3.0 Singles 402461226185
5MacLean0621633197

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
Seanna Morgan
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.98
Peyton Earey
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.93
Hannah Bodemann
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.76
Alison Boswell
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.67
Amy Gibbons
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
Donna Waller
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Lezlie Bermudez
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Pamela Dieffenbauch
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Seanna Morgan
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%21%79%
3.12
Peyton Earey
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%56%43%
2.98
Hannah Bodemann
5W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Alison Boswell
6W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
3%92%4%
2.76
3
Amy Gibbons
7W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
Donna Waller
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Lezlie Bermudez
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Pamela Dieffenbauch
5W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.