Teams

LCTA18/Little/DIC

2022 STA 18 & Over Combo Doubles · 18 & Over Combo Women 6.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.39 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 18 & Over Combo Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Ann Harrah
published 4.5
Emily Little
published 4
3.40
Elizabeth Putignano
published 3.5
3.36
Jennifer Yarbrough
published
3.27
Jill Hobbs
published
3.10
Jana Upshaw
published
2.97
Lisa Battista
published
2.93
Debbie OBrien
published 3
2.88
Cristina Alex
published 3.5
2.75
Shelly Leeke
published
Erin Hudson
published 3
Gail Russell
published 3
2.57
2.57
Elke Pizzo
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shelly Leeke + Jana Upshaw5258% games+6.6% vs expected
Cristina Alex + Erin Hudson12754% games+1.3% vs expected
Elke Pizzo + Heather Moldenhauer3644% games−9.2% vs expected
Jennifer Yarbrough + Jana Upshaw213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ann Harrah
40W–14L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
4.21
4
Emily Little
57W–19L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Elizabeth Putignano
70W–56L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.40
Jennifer Yarbrough
27W–18L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.36
Jill Hobbs
21W–18L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Jana Upshaw
61W–87L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
Lisa Battista
27W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Debbie OBrien
79W–47L career · no lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
2.93
3.5
Cristina Alex
55W–27L career · type A · no lines in 2022
82%18%<1%
2.88
Shelly Leeke
42W–35L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Erin Hudson
37W–19L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Gail Russell
48W–48L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Heather Moldenhauer
15W–18L career · type A · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
2.57
3
Elke Pizzo
30W–37L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
2.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.