Teams

Tampa Palms Hit and Run - A. McKenna

2024 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over ESL · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.17 / REGION_3

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-11-13vs Arbor Greene - C. VanMeterLost 01
L#2 SinglesPat Morris vs Cheri Snyder2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-10-30vs Davis Island Serve Aces - A. QuinnLost 01
L#3 DoublesPat Morris / Maria Ramirez vs Lara Saade / Laurie Powell4-6, 2-6
2023-10-02vs Carrollwood Chaos - B. HerronSplit 11
W#2 DoublesPamela Gonzalez / Maria Ramirez vs Johnessa Hern / Karen Wingard7-6, 7-6
L#3 DoublesJolanta Lagowski / Brenda Paprocki vs Kristin Nail / Lacy Gregory1-6, 0-6
2023-09-25vs Cheval - B. BurdetteWon 10
W#3 DoublesBrenda Paprocki / Jolanta Lagowski vs Vera Trayner / Lauren Jennings6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-09-18vs Avila - A. StaffordLost 02
L#1 DoublesPamela Gonzalez / Kathleen Daciek vs Stacey Lee / Anne Stafford1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesPat Morris vs Vanessa Bergin2-6, 1-6
2023-09-11vs TYCC Yachty By Nature - L. DavittLost 01
L#1 DoublesPamela Gonzalez / Hyun Kim vs Katie Johnson / Ali Garrity2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Cecilia Rattes
published 3.5
3.02
Cille Williams
published 3
2.96
Hyun Kim
published
2.73
Ketty Smith
published
2.66
Risa Blake
published
2.56
Jihea Helme
published
2.52
Kathleen Daciek
published
2.41
Pamela Gonzalez
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.33
Anne McKenna
published 3
2.29
Pat Morris
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Jolanta Lagowski
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pat Morris + Pamela Gonzalez0623% gamesnot enough data
Pamela Gonzalez + Jolanta Lagowski2446% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cecilia Rattes
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
3
Cille Williams
62W–32L career · no lines in 2024
<1%43%57%
3.02
Hyun Kim
9W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
2.96
Ketty Smith
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
Risa Blake
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
2.66
Jihea Helme
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
2.56
Kathleen Daciek
10W–14L career · no lines in 2024
0%45%55%
2.52
Pamela Gonzalez
26W–75L career · 3 lines in 2024
75%25%<1%
2.41
3
Anne McKenna
3W–11L career · no lines in 2024
88%12%<1%
2.33
Pat Morris
31W–89L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%93%7%
2.29
Jolanta Lagowski
45W–64L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.