Teams

The Edge

2025 Montgomery Doubles Winter Women · Montgomery Doubles Winter 4.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-03-26vs WGCCWon 10
W#3 DoublesKaryn Ialeggio / Sandy Schefkind vs Pamela Poth / Jackie Chipman6-2, 6-1
2025-03-12vs Norbeck PurpleLost 01
L#2 DoublesKaryn Ialeggio / Poli Noyes vs Christine Nowack / Christine Willey4-6, 2-6
2025-02-27vs Double TroubleLost 01
L#2 DoublesRaina Fishbane / Karyn Ialeggio vs Lorali Barber / Norma Mendelson6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2025-02-19vs MagginLost 01
L#3 DoublesKaren Dubrow / Karyn Ialeggio vs Catherine Zimmermann / Jenna Harar4-6, 3-6
2025-02-07vs BCC AcesLost 01
L#1 DoublesKaryn Ialeggio / Randi Tercyak vs Susan Emmer / Sari Taft1-6, 0-6
2025-01-28vs Manor 4.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKaryn Ialeggio / Elizabeth Brody vs Susan Quirk / Lisa Hanagan6-7, 1-6
2025-01-20vs Congressional 4.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesRandi Tercyak / Cheng Hoon Lim vs Carolyn Ridgway / Haas Wallace3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPoli Noyes / Karen Leder vs Lori Clogg / Kary Magruder6-2, 6-3
2025-01-15vs Power SmashWon 10
W#2 DoublesRaina Fishbane / Karyn Ialeggio vs Noelle Lynch / Marie Israelite6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Doubles Winter 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Poli Noyes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Cheng Hoon Lim
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.46
Karyn Ialeggio
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.46
3.43
Raina Fishbane
published
3.40
Karen Leder
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Claire Merril
published 3.5
3.11
Boni Vinter
published 3.5
Elizabeth Brody
published
Laveta Duke
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Randi Tercyak
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sandy Schefkind
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Poli Noyes
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
3.5
Cheng Hoon Lim
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Karyn Ialeggio
45W–30L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.46
Kiersten Butterfield
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
3.46
Raina Fishbane
1W–8L career · no lines in 2025
69%31%<1%
3.43
Karen Leder
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
77%23%<1%
3.40
3.5
Claire Merril
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Boni Vinter
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
Elizabeth Brody
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Laveta Duke
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Randi Tercyak
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sandy Schefkind
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.