Teams

Schmitz, Neil

2024 Adult Mixed 55 & Over 6.0 - 9.0 · 7.0 Mixed - 55&Over

12 players · average NTRP 3.21 / HEART OF AMERICA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-09-27vs HOA/Asbell/55&over7.0 MXDLost 03
L#1 DoublesChuck Johnson / Andrea Root vs Delane Cohen / Shashi Bhat3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJim McNeile / Ami Horton vs Stacie Temple / RAGHURAMAN RAMASUBBU2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesANDRE CURIEL / JUDY STAROSCIK vs Tasha Evatt / John Evatt6-7, 2-6
2024-09-06vs HOA/Asbell/55&over7.0 MXDLost 12
W#1 DoublesJeff Hargroves / Amy Hargroves vs Roy True / Jacqui Jensen6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesANDRE CURIEL / Ami Horton vs Jeffrey Asbell / Stacie Temple2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesChuck Johnson / Karen Rogers vs Mike Holm / Karen Luchinsky3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 7.0 Mixed - 55&Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HOA/Asbell/55&over7.0 MXD5112614145
2Craig, John3310817148
3Schmitz, Neil2471124172
4Curtis, Brian2471126185

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Jeff Hargroves
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Neil Schmitz
published
3.27
Andrea Root
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Amy Hargroves
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
ANDRE CURIEL
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.20
Maryalice Williams
published
3.12
Karen Rogers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Ami Horton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Chuck Johnson
published 3
2.62
Bruce Kenney
published 3
2.48
JUDY STAROSCIK
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jim McNeile
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrea Root + Neil Schmitz123 matchesnot enough data
Karen Rogers + Jeff Hargroves303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeff Hargroves
28W–11L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%53%47%
3.49
Neil Schmitz
54W–48L career · no lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Andrea Root
93W–120L career · 1 line in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Amy Hargroves
19W–76L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
3.5
ANDRE CURIEL
19W–35L career · 2 lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.21
Maryalice Williams
45W–62L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.20
Karen Rogers
148W–76L career · 1 line in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.12
3
Ami Horton
2W–27L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Chuck Johnson
0W–6L career · type S · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Bruce Kenney
5W–11L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
2.62
3
JUDY STAROSCIK
123W–152L career · 1 line in 2024
56%44%<1%
2.48
Jim McNeile
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.