Teams

CCV Beale

2023 Richmond Flexible Format Women · Richmond Flexible Format Women 7.0

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-22vs HCC Lines 7.0Won 10
W#3 Female DoublesAllison Purcell / Kirsti Goodwin vs Kimberly Ross / Stacey Haug3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-05-15vs Woodlake HannonLost 01
L#2 Female DoublesAllison Purcell / Kirsti Goodwin vs Rosie Ortiz / Robin Oldt3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-05-08vs MAC MortonLost 01
L#2 Female DoublesKirsti Goodwin / Jennifer Levy vs Katie Hambrick / Susan Greenspoon1-6, 4-6
2023-05-01vs Westwood SeredniWon 10
W#3 Female DoublesKirsti Goodwin / Allison Purcell vs Caren Payne / Christine Holt6-3, 6-3
2023-04-24vs RMC SweeneyWon 10
W#3 Female DoublesKirsti Goodwin / Allison Purcell vs Kimberly Garrett / Cynthia Muncy7-6, 6-3
2023-04-17vs Raintree EntersLost 01
L#1 Female DoublesKirsti Goodwin / Ashley Millen vs Suzanne Spadafora / Amy Scherer3-6, 4-6
2023-04-10vs Bon Air RhodesWon 10
W#3 Female DoublesAllison Purcell / Kirsti Goodwin vs Rebecca Madison / Donna Lawson6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Flexible Format Women 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Allison Purcell
published 4
3.73
Ashley Millen
published 4
3.25
Windy Campbell
published
3.25
Kirsten Boyd
published
2.98
Kirsti Goodwin
usually #3 Female Doubles 57%, also #2 Female Doubles 29% · published
Jennifer Levy
published
Robin Reifsnider
published
Thornton Lambert
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Allison Purcell
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Ashley Millen
6W–12L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
Windy Campbell
5W–17L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
Kirsten Boyd
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
Kirsti Goodwin
56W–53L career · 7 lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
2.98
Jennifer Levy
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Robin Reifsnider
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Thornton Lambert
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.