Teams

Liipfert-Beere/Bentonville/KTC

2026 Combo 18 & Over 2.5, 6.5, 8.5, 10.5 · 6.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 upcoming · 1 played
Sep 9 12:00 AM
Shadow Valley Country Club
Sep 16 12:00 AM
Fayetteville Athletic Club
Sep 23 12:00 AM
Matrix Racquet Club
Sep 30 12:00 AM
Kingsdale Tennis Center
Oct 7 12:00 AM
Kingsdale Tennis Center
2026-08-27vs Kurin-Kushmaul/Bentonville/MRCLost 03
L#1 DoublesBritt Mcewen / Katelyn Bird vs Hattie Kurin / Mandy Shelton0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCarrie Beere / Elena Olson vs Maya Kushmaul / Katherine Ferrer6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAnnemarie Porter / Lorena Serrese Warn vs Katherine Wetzel / Natalie Gorman4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 6.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hradsky/Bentonville/MRC000000
2Schutz-Greaser/Springdale/SRC000000
3Guido/Bentonville/IND000000
4Weber/Farmington/FAC000000
5Kurin-Kushmaul/Bentonville/MRC000000
6Liipfert-Beere/Bentonville/KTC000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Keisha Walters
published
3.14
Liz Grossman
published
3.09
Melissa Campana
published
2.94
Carrie Beere
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.90
Lorena Serrese Warn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Annemarie Porter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Britt Mcewen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Tracy Liipfert
published
2.45
Nichole Surber
published
Katelyn Bird
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carrie Beere + Annemarie Porter213 matchesnot enough data
Carrie Beere + Britt Mcewen123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Keisha Walters
5W–3L career · no lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Liz Grossman
2W–3L career · no lines in 2026
15%84%1%
3.14
Melissa Campana
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
25%74%<1%
3.09
3
Carrie Beere
24W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%67%33%
2.94
Lorena Serrese Warn
6W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%75%25%
2.90
3
Annemarie Porter
22W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Britt Mcewen
4W–10L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
Tracy Liipfert
12W–14L career · no lines in 2026
4%92%3%
2.74
Nichole Surber
1W–10L career · no lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
2.45
Katelyn Bird
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.