Teams

Bardmoor 2.5 40

2026 Pinellas Adult 40 & Over Spring · 2.5 W Sat (3 cts)

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-07vs SPTC Holliday 2.5 40Split 11
W#1 DoublesPatricia Lenz / Randee Carl vs Kathy Wallen / Angela Walker6-0, 6-4
L#1 SinglesAmy Mangueira vs Minh D Le7-6, 0-6, 0-1
2026-06-03vs SPTC Holliday 2.5 40Split 11
L#1 DoublesAmy Mangueira / Patricia Timmerman vs Minh D Le / Kathy Wallen4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRandee Carl / Maureen Ellison vs Marcia Crawley / Laura Conley6-3, 6-0
2026-05-30vs SPTC Holliday 2.5 40Split 11
W#1 DoublesChristina Bordeaux / Maureen Ellison vs Minh D Le / Laura Conley7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEmily Lischer / Patricia Lenz vs Kathy Wallen / Angela Walker3-6, 1-6
2026-05-09vs SPTC Holliday 2.5 40Won 10
W#1 DoublesChristina Bordeaux / Randee Carl vs Kathy Wallen / Minh D Le6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-05-02vs SPTC Holliday 2.5 40Split 11
W#1 DoublesPatricia Lenz / Randee Carl vs Kathy Wallen / Angela Walker6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesAmy Mangueira vs Minh D Le5-7, 3-6
2026-04-18vs SPTC Holliday 2.5 40Split 11
L#1 DoublesChristina Bordeaux / Patricia Lenz vs Kathy Wallen / Angela Walker4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesAmy Mangueira vs Marcia Crawley6-0, 6-0
2026-04-11vs SPTC Holliday 2.5 40Split 11
W#1 DoublesChristina Bordeaux / Amy Mangueira vs Stephanie Rossman / Minh D Le3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPatricia Lenz / Emily Lischer vs Angela Walker / Kathy Wallen6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 2.5 W Sat (3 cts)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SPTC Holliday 2.5 4043111021156
2Bardmoor 2.5 4034101125178

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.25 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.40
Maureen Ellison
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.38
Patricia Lenz
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.29
Randee Carl
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.26
Christina Bordeaux
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.25
Amy Mangueira
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.19
Emily Lischer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.99
Patricia Timmerman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emily Lischer + Patricia Lenz4252% games+3.6% vs expected
Christina Bordeaux + Randee Carl123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maureen Ellison
5W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%75%25%
2.40
Patricia Lenz
7W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%81%19%
2.38
Randee Carl
4W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.29
2.5
Christina Bordeaux
6W–7L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.26
2.5
Amy Mangueira
5W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.25
Emily Lischer
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
Patricia Timmerman
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.99

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.