Teams

BP RED

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.5 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 4.39 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-14vs SS-LGT GREENLost 13
W#1 DoublesVictoria Barstow / Anne Perry vs Natasha Vissering Hutter / Amber McGregor6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesDori Webb vs Michelle Reeb5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRosemary Garcia / Andrea Philleo vs Katherine Krause / Mandy Paul2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesYukiko Brooks / Emily Jensik vs Meredith Smith / Jamie Steese6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2026-07-07vs LTFC GREENWon 31
L#1 DoublesDenise Hernandez / Roselle Morala vs Lori Benson / Barb Hedges0-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 SinglesCameron Passmore vs Julia Bridgewater6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesAnne Perry / Victoria Barstow vs Carol Jochens / Angela Seaberg6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAndrea Philleo / Rosemary Garcia vs Colleen Frank / Danielle Martines6-0, 6-4
2026-06-30vs WP GREENSplit 22
W#1 DoublesDenise Hernandez / Roselle Morala vs Erin Eggland / Kristen Tourangeau6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesCameron Passmore vs Michelle Miller6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesEmily Jensik / Rosemary Garcia vs Leslie Hanna / Jennifer Mele7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesYukiko Brooks / Dori Webb vs Janet McNutt / Meg Staebell3-6, 4-6
2026-06-23vs SS-LGT BLUELost 04
L#1 DoublesAndrea Philleo / Rosemary Garcia vs Anne Quallick / Jordan Campbell3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesDori Webb vs Kristin Petty6-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesCameron Passmore / Victoria Barstow vs Emily Markwell / Jennifer Armstrong6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesEmily Jensik / Yukiko Brooks vs Avery Tilney / Tanya Harrington5-7, 2-6
2026-06-16vs KC-CC REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesDenise Hernandez / Roselle Morala vs Megan Melucci / Radhika Acharya-Leon6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAnne Perry vs Laura Kannaka6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAndrea Philleo / Emily Jensik vs Shannon Kiebler / Emily Oermann3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDori Webb / Yukiko Brooks vs Meghan Geisler / Jodi Thomas7-5, 6-3
2026-06-09vs JCC BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesDenise Hernandez / Roselle Morala vs Khanh Huyen / Juana Donald3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesCameron Passmore vs Lauren Perry4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesVictoria Barstow / Anne Perry vs Clare Morey / Julie Lang7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAndrea Philleo / Rosemary Garcia vs Caitlin Finn / Michelle Topf7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2026-06-02vs CACM NAVYWon 31
W#1 DoublesDenise Hernandez / Roselle Morala vs KC Nettleton / Caroline Carolan6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesCameron Passmore vs Michelle Degitis4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesAnne Perry / Andrea Philleo vs Katherine Ferraro / Rachel Heise6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDori Webb / Yukiko Brooks vs Risa Silverman / Angie Shappell6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.11 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Anne Perry
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4.5
4.28
Victoria Barstow
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.25
Roselle Morala
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.13
Cameron Passmore
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.10
Denise Hernandez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.09
Andrea Philleo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.09
Rosemary Garcia
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.96
Yukiko Brooks
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.93
Dori Webb
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 4
3.88
Emily Jensik
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Yukiko Brooks + Dori Webb6162% games+11.2% vs expected
Rosemary Garcia + Andrea Philleo2346% games−0.9% vs expected
Rosemary Garcia + Yukiko Brooks31144% games−2.6% vs expected
Denise Hernandez + Roselle Morala3346% games−3.5% vs expected
Andrea Philleo + Yukiko Brooks2634% games−14.8% vs expected
Andrea Philleo + Denise Hernandez3253% gamesnot enough data
Denise Hernandez + Yukiko Brooks0538% gamesnot enough data
Rosemary Garcia + Denise Hernandez224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Anne Perry
35W–17L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%85%14%
4.36
4.5
Victoria Barstow
69W–63L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
4.28
4.5
Roselle Morala
111W–43L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Cameron Passmore
83W–32L career · type A · 5 lines in 2026
15%84%<1%
4.13
4.5
Denise Hernandez
55W–73L career · 5 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
4.10
4.5
Andrea Philleo
52W–75L career · 6 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
4.09
Rosemary Garcia
17W–49L career · 5 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
4.09
4
Yukiko Brooks
145W–118L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.96
4
Dori Webb
123W–55L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.93
4.5
Emily Jensik
44W–52L career · 4 lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
3.88

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.