Teams

HRCA GREEN

2022 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.30 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2022-04-19vs SSD REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesAnthony Cataldo / Chad McCann vs Edward Lucero / Michael Huynh6-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesBen Roxborough / Michael Deminski vs David Lash / Eric Thorn3-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesJohn Dungey vs John Randazzo6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDavid Valenciano / Rob Sidrow vs Volodymyr Sukhovetskyy / Mitchell Kaplan2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
John Dungey
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Anthony Cataldo
published 3.5
Chad McCann
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Gary Capps
published 3.5
2.43
David Valenciano
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Ben Roxborough
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jon Rottier
published
Michael Deminski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Nolan Johnson
published
Rob Sidrow
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Warren Olsen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gary Capps + John Dungey6256% games−2.4% vs expected
Michael Deminski + Nolan Johnson2842% games−2.9% vs expected
Warren Olsen + Chad McCann2445% games−3.1% vs expected
Michael Deminski + Chad McCann0639% games−7.0% vs expected
Michael Deminski + Warren Olsen2353% gamesnot enough data
Rob Sidrow + David Valenciano134 matchesnot enough data
Rob Sidrow + Michael Deminski134 matchesnot enough data
David Valenciano + Warren Olsen224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
John Dungey
77W–47L career · 1 line in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Anthony Cataldo
no matches on record · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Chad McCann
24W–48L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Gary Capps
42W–31L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
2.5
David Valenciano
25W–60L career · 1 line in 2022
0%72%28%
2.43
Ben Roxborough
3W–1L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Jon Rottier
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Michael Deminski
10W–48L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Nolan Johnson
11W–26L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rob Sidrow
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Warren Olsen
33W–26L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.