Teams

WI Adult 55&O 7.0W (Day) GML FLAC Schmidt

2026 WI Adult 55 & Over Summer 7.0 W Day · 2026 WI Adult 55 & Over Summer 7.0 W (day)

10 players · average NTRP 3.36 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesJoyce Koker / Karen Papcke vs Danielle Winchell / Stephanie Waddell6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTheresa Leopold / Susan Schmidt vs Karen Freudenberg / Cindy Simonovich7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKathy Kort / Sarah Evans vs Mary Madden / Cathleen Nelson6-0, 6-7, 1-0
2026-07-15Won 21
L#1 DoublesSusan Schmidt / Theresa Leopold vs Mary Madden / Karen Freudenberg6-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesJoyce Koker / Kathleen Streit vs Patricia Lai / Cathleen Nelson6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKaren Papcke / Elizabeth Quigley vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#1 DoublesJill Polkow / Elizabeth Quigley vs Karelyn Hopkins / Danielle Winchell6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJulee Scherrer / Karen Papcke vs Susan Buzzard / Karen Freudenberg6-4
W#3 DoublesKathy Kort / Julie Haeger vs Patricia Lai / Mary Madden7-5, 6-3
W#1 DoublesJill Polkow / Elizabeth Quigley vs Stephanie Waddell / Melissa Alexander6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesSarah Evans / Kathy Kort vs Susan Buzzard / Cindy Simonovich5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJulie Haeger / Karen Papcke vs Karen Freudenberg / Patricia Lai7-5, 6-3
W#1 DoublesJill Polkow / Joyce Koker vs Karelyn Hopkins / Melissa Alexander6-0, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Quigley / Kathleen Streit vs Danielle Winchell / Stephanie Waddell6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKathy Kort / Theresa Leopold vs Cindy Simonovich / Cathleen Nelson6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesJulee Scherrer / Karen Papcke vs Karelyn Hopkins / Danielle Winchell6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSarah Evans / Julie Haeger vs Karen Freudenberg / Mary Madden4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJoyce Koker / Jill Polkow vs Cindy Simonovich / Susan Buzzard6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 2026 WI Adult 55 & Over Summer 7.0 W (day)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WI Adult 55&O 7.0W (Day) GML FLAC Schmidt6015311121
2WI Adult 55&O 7.0W (Day) GML FLAC Buzzard0631532215

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Joyce Koker
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.71
Elizabeth Quigley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.70
Julee Scherrer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.39
Julie Haeger
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Kathy Kort
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.16
Theresa Leopold
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.12
Karen Papcke
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.99
Jill Polkow
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.79
Kathleen Streit
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Sarah Evans
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Papcke + Julee Scherrer7553% games−3.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joyce Koker
75W–43L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.84
Elizabeth Quigley
90W–60L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Julee Scherrer
30W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.70
3.5
Julie Haeger
61W–38L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Kathy Kort
76W–49L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Theresa Leopold
88W–64L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.16
3
Karen Papcke
84W–53L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%20%80%
3.12
3
Jill Polkow
17W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
2.99
3
Kathleen Streit
6W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
Sarah Evans
15W–8L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.