Teams

CON:NetNinjas:Nolet:Rados

2024 NH Adult 40 & Over Women Day · 3.5 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NEW HAMPSHIRE

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-06-18vs HH:RacketRebels:Jones:ColemanLost 13
L#1 DoublesMarta Pedersen / Thi Smith vs Tiani Coleman / Lisa Mancini3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCarrie Nolet vs Teresa Colena6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLaurie Rauseo / Juanita Richard vs Jocelyn Jones / Paula Donovan Olsen7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMary Kruzel / Marie Stevens vs Nancy Vieira / Stacy Leonard6-1, 5-7, 0-1
2024-06-11vs LNH:RacquetsUp:BouressaWon 40
W#1 DoublesKarley Watt / Thi Smith vs Chris Bouressa / Jennifer McCalmont6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesCarrie Nolet vs Tracey Gamache6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMichelle Gould / Marie Stevens vs Jan Goplerud / Patricia Halpin4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJuanita Richard / Jane Cremeno vs Shannon Richmond / Janice Wiegman6-0, 6-1
2024-06-04vs YMCA:Champoux:GoldsteinLost 13
W#1 DoublesThi Smith / Karley Watt vs Noel Correnti / Tammy Goldstein4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMichelle Gould vs Michele Plasz3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCarrie Nolet / Deborah Vallieres vs Kate Rice / Cheryl Conaway-Nelson5-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesLaurie Rauseo / Mary Kruzel vs Laura Czerw / Susan Rouleau2-6, 4-6
2024-05-28vs HH:RacketRebels:Jones:ColemanLost 13
L#1 DoublesKarley Watt / Deborah Vallieres vs Jessica Weisberg / Kimberly Bogle1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesCarrie Nolet vs Debora Thoele -Cziprusz7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesThi Smith / Marie Stevens vs Tiani Coleman / Zola Brown4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMary Kruzel / Brigitte Cook vs Jocelyn Jones / Lisa Mancini3-6, 2-6
2024-05-21vs LNH:RacquetsUp:BouressaLost 13
L#1 DoublesDeborah Vallieres / Karley Watt vs Chris Bouressa / Carol Merchant6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesThi Smith vs Tracey Gamache6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesCarrie Nolet / Laurie Rauseo vs Heajung Kim-Aiello / Gabrielle Green2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBrigitte Cook / Jane Cremeno vs Kathryn Prolman / Shannon Richmond4-6, 4-6
2024-05-14vs YMCA:Champoux:GoldsteinSplit 22
W#1 DoublesHeidi Waite / Michelle Gould vs Noel Correnti / Kate Rice6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesCarrie Nolet vs Susan Bossi6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKarley Watt / Deborah Vallieres vs Lorraine Dokas / Sandra Jean6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMarie Stevens / Juanita Richard vs Tamasine Wood-Creighton / Andrea Sullivan4-6, 2-6
2024-05-07vs HH:RacketRebels:Jones:ColemanWon 31
L#1 DoublesHeidi Waite / Michelle Gould vs Jessica Weisberg / Tiani Coleman3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesThi Smith vs Teresa Colena6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDeborah Vallieres / Carrie Nolet vs Jocelyn Jones / Zola Brown7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLaurie Rauseo / Juanita Richard vs Cristina Adair / Elsa Galvez6-2, 7-5
2024-04-30vs LNH:RacquetsUp:BouressaWon 31
W#1 DoublesKarley Watt / Thi Smith vs Jennifer McCalmont / Chris Bouressa6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesMichelle Gould vs Tracey Gamache6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCarrie Nolet / Juanita Richard vs Lisa Nelson / Jan Goplerud6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJane Cremeno / Mary Kruzel vs Janice Wiegman / Elizabeth Dundas3-6, 6-7
2024-04-16vs YMCA:Champoux:GoldsteinLost 13
L#1 DoublesKarley Watt / Marta Pedersen vs Noel Correnti / Tammy Goldstein4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesThi Smith vs Patricia Cote6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCarrie Nolet / Deborah Vallieres vs Susan Rouleau / Kate Rice2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLaurie Rauseo / Mary Kruzel vs Cheryl Conaway-Nelson / Lorraine Dokas6-3, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GH:Smith:Keigwin08201228240
2RVC:SmashHits:Chaltain:Gorman08131941307
3IND::ILoveThisGameOutdoors:Nippe:Nardo08131942305
4BOSS:Dolan:Markenson08122047334
5HSB:Weidknecht09211533290
6GB:Quinn09191738342
7LNH:RacquetsUp:Bouressa09171942332
8CON:NetNinjas:Nolet:Rados09162044317
9WWCC:MatchtimeMoonballers:Zimmerman:Porter09171945343
10YORK:Green09152147341
11HH:RacketRebels:Jones:Coleman09112556384

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Thi Smith
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published
3.46
Heidi Waite
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.39
Michelle Gould
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.39
Karley Watt
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
3.36
Marta Pedersen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Carrie Nolet
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Singles 44% · published 3.5
3.28
Deborah Vallieres
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Mary Kruzel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Cathleen Desmarais
published 3.5
3.08
Brigitte Cook
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.04
Juanita Richard
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.97
Laurie Rauseo
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.94
Marie Stevens
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.78
Jane Cremeno
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Nina Rados
published
Philippa Smith
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karley Watt + Thi Smith13267% games+13.4% vs expected
Heidi Waite + Deborah Vallieres16070% games+13.0% vs expected
Brigitte Cook + Deborah Vallieres4162% games+12.1% vs expected
Jane Cremeno + Heidi Waite8355% games+7.8% vs expected
Jane Cremeno + Juanita Richard7558% games+6.6% vs expected
Michelle Gould + Heidi Waite251259% games+6.5% vs expected
Marie Stevens + Juanita Richard3643% games+5.8% vs expected
Marta Pedersen + Thi Smith5255% games+4.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Thi Smith
89W–72L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
3.46
Heidi Waite
76W–46L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
3.46
Michelle Gould
77W–56L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%77%22%
3.39
Karley Watt
35W–22L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.39
Marta Pedersen
33W–42L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%84%16%
3.36
3.5
Carrie Nolet
54W–42L career · 9 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Deborah Vallieres
61W–32L career · 6 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
Mary Kruzel
42W–79L career · 5 lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
3.13
3.5
Cathleen Desmarais
27W–30L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Brigitte Cook
41W–43L career · 2 lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.08
Juanita Richard
49W–85L career · 5 lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
3.04
Laurie Rauseo
41W–65L career · 5 lines in 2024
58%42%<1%
2.97
Marie Stevens
52W–76L career · 4 lines in 2024
66%34%<1%
2.94
Jane Cremeno
51W–77L career · 3 lines in 2024
94%6%<1%
2.78
Nina Rados
15W–35L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Philippa Smith
10W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.