Teams

USTA-Cogswell

2026 ORANGESEMINOLE Combo 50 & Over- Night · 5.5 Combo 50+ - Women

14 players · average NTRP 2.67 / REGION_4

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 upcoming
Sep 14 7:00 PM
USTA National Campus
Sep 21 7:00 PM
USTA National Campus
Sep 28 7:00 PM
USTA National Campus
Oct 5 7:00 PM
USTA National Campus
Oct 12 7:00 PM
USTA National Campus
Oct 19 7:00 PM
USTA National Campus
Oct 26 7:00 PM
USTA National Campus
Flight standings2 teams · 5.5 Combo 50+ - Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1USTA-Cogswell000000
2USTA Campus-Bonilla- Court Queens000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.38 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.83
April Filer
published 3
2.50
Marie George
published
2.49
Irina Jacobs
published
2.38
Sue Ventura
published
2.31
Susan Cogswell
published
2.19
Anna Soloveychik
published 2.5
1.94
Annette Burkett
published 2.5
Eileen Gibson
published
Farah Van Deering
published
Karin Hammond
published
Laurel Stadtmauer
published
Mariko Ford
published
Stacey Mancuso
published
Susanne Walker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Irina Jacobs + Annette Burkett123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
April Filer
5W–2L career · no lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
Marie George
2W–4L career · no lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
2.50
Irina Jacobs
14W–4L career · no lines in 2026
0%52%48%
2.49
Sue Ventura
4W–12L career · no lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
2.38
Susan Cogswell
3W–3L career · no lines in 2026
0%91%9%
2.31
2.5
Anna Soloveychik
8W–8L career · no lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
2.5
Annette Burkett
4W–10L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.94
Eileen Gibson
5W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Farah Van Deering
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Karin Hammond
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Laurel Stadtmauer
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Mariko Ford
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Stacey Mancuso
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Susanne Walker
1W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.