Teams

SDNC 3.0 Fairbanks Ranch CC (3:1)/ Semerdjian

2023 Adult 40 & Over Winter- SDNC WD · SDNC - Women - 3.0 WD

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
L#1 DoublesNellwyn Voorhies / Eileen Gonzalez vs Ashlee Heartt - (DQ)* / Heather Iantorno4-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesRocio Gonzalez-Beristain vs Shelie Herman1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJanie Munce / Kathryn Glaser vs Diana Blake / Kerry McCullough1-6, 1-6
2023-03-10Won 10
W#1 SinglesRocio Gonzalez-Beristain vs Julie Reid6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesNellwyn Voorhies vs Kelly Lauro6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJanie Munce / Kathryn Glaser vs Margarita Valero / Grace Presa6-2, 6-1
2023-02-17vs SDNC 3.0 Morgan Run (2:2)/ BolgerLost 01
L#1 SinglesRocio Gonzalez-Beristain vs Jennifer Bolger6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesRocio Gonzalez-Beristain vs Leanna Thompson6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesBrittan Bliss / Kathryn Glaser vs Lori Strom / Melissa Kench7-6, 6-3
2023-02-06Won 10
W#1 SinglesRocio Gonzalez-Beristain vs Kelly Ball6-4, 6-3
L#1 DoublesEileen Gonzalez / Nellwyn Voorhies vs Soo Chen / April Flak3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesRocio Gonzalez-Beristain vs Leslie Lee4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKathryn Glaser / Janie Munce vs Nichola Diggs / Diana Poorman7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesRocio Gonzalez-Beristain vs Rita Zitterman3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesRocio Gonzalez-Beristain vs Lizbeth Flores7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKathryn Glaser / Susana M Smith vs Deanne Davis / Debbie Kuntz6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - Women - 3.0 WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.97
Nellwyn Voorhies
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.80
Christy Horton
published 3
2.74
Kathryn Glaser
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.73
Eileen Gonzalez
published 3
2.73
Rocio Gonzalez-Beristain
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.57
Peggy Semerdjian
published
2.28
Janie Munce
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathryn Glaser + Nellwyn Voorhies314 matchesnot enough data
Kathryn Glaser + Janie Munce123 matchesnot enough data
Nellwyn Voorhies + Rocio Gonzalez-Beristain213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Nellwyn Voorhies
96W–49L career · 3 lines in 2023
59%41%<1%
2.97
3
Christy Horton
4W–14L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Kathryn Glaser
31W–40L career · 5 lines in 2023
3%95%2%
2.74
3
Eileen Gonzalez
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Rocio Gonzalez-Beristain
50W–49L career · 8 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
Peggy Semerdjian
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
2.57
2.5
Janie Munce
17W–62L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%95%5%
2.28

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.