Teams

Fairhope - Jennings/Brake

2025 Combo 40 & Over Women Night - Mobile · 5.5 Women Night 40

14 players · average NTRP 2.50 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-15vs Spirit Park - Baker/GardnerWon 30
W#1 DoublesMary Brake / Renea Canton vs Colleen Peavy / Sasha Butler6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJane Wiggins / Susan Nance vs Charlotte Baker / Laurelle Gardner6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesGeri Gautney / Karoliina Maununiemi vs Kelley Morris / Jennifer Kuba7-5, 7-5
2025-07-08vs MTC - BogolinWon 21
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Brinkley / Susan Nance vs Alice Huber / Candace Matheny7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMary Brake / Renea Canton vs Nikki Nicholson / Lauren Carter7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJulia Jennings / Nancy Ursprung vs Brantley Caldwell / Kathy Belter0-6, 1-6
2025-06-30vs MTC - BogolinLost 03
L#1 DoublesNancy Ursprung / Mitzi Seales vs Alice Huber / Wanda Johnson2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJulia Jennings / Geri Gautney vs Carolyn Simmons / Kathy Belter1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCatharine Burch / DEBBIE NELSON vs Lauren Carter / Elizabeth Boone4-4
2025-06-24vs MTC-CurtisWon 21
W#1 DoublesMary Brake / Mitzi Seales vs Kimberly Wilson Curtis / Becky Tate6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesGeri Gautney / Julia Jennings vs Kellie Eck / Beverly Boggan2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCatharine Burch / Karoliina Maununiemi vs Selena Hemphill / Shelley Stephens6-3, 6-1
2025-06-17vs Spirit Park - Baker/GardnerWon 30
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Brinkley / Susan Nance vs Laurelle Gardner / Teresa Taylor6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMary Brake / Mitzi Seales vs Charlotte Baker / Kelley Morris6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNancy Ursprung / Karoliina Maununiemi vs Lillian Stanley / Sasha Butler6-1, 7-5
2025-06-03vs MTC-CurtisWon 21
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Brinkley / Susan Nance vs Kimberly Wilson Curtis / Sondra Leslie6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesNancy Ursprung / Jessica Wine vs Stacey Johns / Karen Bowman6-1, 7-5
L#3 DoublesJulia Jennings / DEBBIE NELSON vs Prudence Meadors / Sharron Jackson2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women Night 40 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.53 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.68
Martina Forsch
published
2.65
Elizabeth Brinkley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Susan Nance
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.60
Renea Canton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.59
Jane Wiggins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.57
Catharine Burch
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.51
Mary Brake
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.45
Geri Gautney
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.35
Nancy Ursprung
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.28
Julia Jennings
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
DEBBIE NELSON
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Jessica Wine
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Karoliina Maununiemi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mitzi Seales
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Brake + Renea Canton2546% games−12.2% vs expected
Julia Jennings + Nancy Ursprung0520% games−17.4% vs expected
Julia Jennings + Geri Gautney1629% games−18.3% vs expected
Geri Gautney + Nancy Ursprung044 matchesnot enough data
Geri Gautney + Elizabeth Brinkley224 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Brinkley + Susan Nance314 matchesnot enough data
Catharine Burch + Julia Jennings123 matchesnot enough data
Mary Brake + Jane Wiggins123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Martina Forsch
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Elizabeth Brinkley
10W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
14%86%1%
2.65
Susan Nance
23W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%17%83%
2.63
Renea Canton
5W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
2.60
Jane Wiggins
6W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
26%74%<1%
2.59
2.5
Catharine Burch
11W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%31%69%
2.57
Mary Brake
7W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
2.51
Geri Gautney
25W–37L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%64%36%
2.45
Nancy Ursprung
8W–24L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%87%13%
2.35
Julia Jennings
17W–44L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%94%6%
2.28
2.5
DEBBIE NELSON
2W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jessica Wine
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Karoliina Maununiemi
5W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mitzi Seales
2W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.