Teams

Refunds

Lake USTA 40 & Over Summer Singles · Refunds

14 players · average NTRP 3.05 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Refunds have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Danielle Mikolajczyk
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Colleen Penhall
published 3
3.20
Lisa Bartolucci
published 3
3.00
ERIN Wells
published 3
2.93
Lisa Zitel
published
2.92
2.84
Jennifer Melby
published
2.83
2.75
Tara Hauk
published
2.74
Kate Straiter
published 3
2.69
Claudia Burdulis
published 3
2.66
Amy English
published 3
2.54
Alysia Han
published 3
2.45
Suzy Wright
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

ERIN Wells + Lisa Bartolucci5252% games+6.4% vs expected
Lisa Bartolucci + Kate Straiter4353% gamesnot enough data
Colleen Penhall + Lisa Bartolucci314 matchesnot enough data
ERIN Wells + Colleen Penhall213 matchesnot enough data
Colleen Penhall + Kate Straiter303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Danielle Mikolajczyk
141W–103L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.52
3
Colleen Penhall
48W–23L career · no lines in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.24
3
Lisa Bartolucci
98W–52L career · no lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.20
3
ERIN Wells
47W–22L career · no lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
Lisa Zitel
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Leslie Walters Adams
29W–30L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.92
Jennifer Melby
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
2.84
3
Christine Marcavish
40W–54L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%10%
2.83
Tara Hauk
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Kate Straiter
32W–33L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%2%
2.74
3
Claudia Burdulis
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Amy English
37W–46L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
2.66
3
Alysia Han
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
2.54
3
Suzy Wright
31W–86L career · type A · no lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
2.45

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.