LFW:Wayland:Taunton Rigby/Fordiani

2024 EMA Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Schedule8 played

2024-03-19vs WAY:Wayside Red:AndersenWon 2–0

W#2 DoublesMarcy Buckler / Ivan Loukovnikov vs Jennifer Aufiero / Ken Hickey6-3, 6-1

W#3 DoublesEwa Niemierko / Andrzej Niemierko vs Julie Ellenbogen / Eric Therrien6-4, 6-4

2023-12-29vs MLTC:Wolfpack:WolfLost 0–2

L#1 DoublesRalph Pinto / Joanne Schwartz vs Mark Desrochers / Ann-Marie Hayes4-6, 5-3, 0-1

L#2 DoublesAndrzej Niemierko / Ewa Niemierko vs Martha Papalia / Jim Papalia7-6, 2-3, 0-1

2023-12-15vs WESF:Westfit:JohnsonLost 1–2

L#1 DoublesRalph Pinto / Rita Fordiani vs Emese Varga / Tamas Badics4-6, 7-5, 0-1

W#2 DoublesTom Conroy / Ewa Niemierko vs Michael Williams / Diane Baumgartner7-5, 7-5

L#3 DoublesIvan Loukovnikov / Eileen Pollack vs Kathleen Erickson / Adam Chmielewski4-6, 6-5, 0-1

2023-12-01vs WAY:Wayside Blue:PulnikWon 2–1

L#1 DoublesMarcy Buckler / Tom Conroy vs Chris Hepp / Susan Ash6-2, 2-6, 0-1

W#2 DoublesRita Fordiani / Randy Johnson vs Svetlan Todorov / Kim Pulnik1-6, 7-6, 1-0

W#3 DoublesEwa Niemierko / Andrzej Niemierko vs Eric Baur / Susan Kountz6-3, 6-1

2023-11-03vs WAY:Wayside Red:AndersenLost 1–2

L#1 DoublesPatricia O'Hagan / Tom Conroy vs Julie Ellenbogen / Michael Ellenbogen6-7, 6-2, 0-1

L#2 DoublesAlison Taunton-Rigby / Howard Schwartz vs Nina Lee / Fred Lee0-6, 1-6

W#3 DoublesJim Hutchinson / Katharine Zupan vs Eric Therrien / Erin Warren6-1, 6-1

2023-10-20vs MLTC:Wolfpack:WolfWon 2–1

W#1 DoublesRalph Pinto / Joanne Schwartz vs Elaine Chin / Phil Wolf6-2, 6-6

L#2 DoublesIvan Loukovnikov / Eileen Pollack vs Ann-Marie Hayes / Mark Desrochers2-6, 6-4, 0-1

W#3 DoublesEwa Niemierko / Andrzej Niemierko vs Sara Misch / Bruce Rachman6-3, 6-0

2023-10-06vs WESF:Westfit:JohnsonLost 1–2

W#1 DoublesIvan Loukovnikov / Eileen Pollack vs Adam Chmielewski / Kathleen Erickson7-5, 6-5

L#2 DoublesHoward Schwartz / Katharine Zupan vs Aimee Bell / Michael Williams1-6, 2-6

L#3 DoublesAndrzej Niemierko / Ewa Niemierko vs Diane Baumgartner / Joshua Ruderman6-7, 1-5

2023-09-22vs WAY:Wayside Blue:PulnikWon 2–1

W#1 DoublesRita Fordiani / Ralph Pinto vs Polly Hartin / Albert Grankin6-2, 6-1

L#2 DoublesJoanne Schwartz / Tom Conroy vs Robin Logan / Chris Hepp7-5, 3-6, 0-1

W#3 DoublesAlison Taunton-Rigby / Randy Johnson vs Bernadette Lehmann / Eric Baur6-0, 6-1

A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.

Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings28 teams · 7.0 Mixed

Team	L	Ind. W	Ind. L	Sets lost	Games lost
1WEY:Weymouth:Perez/Prudente	8	18	6	14	173
2WOB:Double Fun:Hou/Swank	8	19	5	14	168
3LAK:LakevilleBlue:Kelliher/Benoit	8	17	7	16	175
4WESF:Westfit:Johnson	8	18	6	17	193
5W109:Wimbledon;Klein/Divincenzo	8	16	8	17	181
6WIG:Wightman:Mulhearn.	8	14	10	23	191
7DED:Dedham:Driscoll	8	15	9	26	223
8MLTC:Wolfpack:Wolf	8	12	12	27	213
9WAY:Wayside Red:Andersen	8	12	12	27	218
10LFW:Wayland:Taunton Rigby/Fordiani	8	11	13	27	211
11WTC:Winchester:Wagner	8	13	11	27	212
12STC:Sportsmen's:Birnberg	8	13	11	29	245
13WAC Aces:Calleva	8	10	14	29	229
14WTC:Winners:Matteuzzi/Hirsch	8	11	13	31	222
15LFNT:Natick:Rennie	8	8	16	36	255
16WEY:Weymouth:Anderson/Gotta	8	6	18	36	251
17WAY:Wayside Blue:Pulnik	8	7	17	39	267
18WTC:Strokes:Maguire	8	2	22	44	283
19ADI:Adirondack:Etienvre/Volpe	8	2	22	45	278
20SFT:Spark:Nardone/Curran	9	22	5	12	178
21SFT:Spark Red:Ehrie	9	22	5	20	215
22PAX:Paxton Red:Dekker/Vaugh	9	17	10	27	244
23NETC:New England TC:Welcom	9	13	14	32	258
24TRU:Trull Brook Red:Klebe/Colena	9	14	13	32	253
25WESB:Khuu;Costello	9	14	13	34	253
26PAX:Paxton Blue:O'Connor	9	8	19	40	260
27CED:Cedardale:Cavallini/Hayden	9	7	20	45	302
28CED:Mix & Match:Stamulis/Moore	9	6	21	46	301

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54

Tom Conroy

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published —

3.47

Ivan Loukovnikov

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published —

3.40

Marcy Buckler

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published —

3.35

Patricia O'Hagan

usually #1 Doubles 100% · published —

3.34

Andrzej Niemierko

usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5

3.34

Ralph Pinto

usually #1 Doubles 100% · published —

3.27

Rita Fordiani

usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published —

—

Alison Taunton-Rigby

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5

3.04

Eileen Pollack

usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published —

3.04

Katharine Zupan

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published —

2.71

Ewa Niemierko

usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published —

—

Howard Schwartz

usually #2 Doubles 100% · published —

—

Jim Hutchinson

usually #3 Doubles 100% · published —

—

Joanne Schwartz

usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published —

—

Randy Johnson

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published —

Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ewa Niemierko + Andrzej Niemierko	12–40	43% games	−9.0% vs expected
Patricia O'Hagan + Tom Conroy	20–14	53% games	not enough data
Rita Fordiani + Jim Hutchinson	8–18	45% games	not enough data
Alison Taunton-Rigby + Randy Johnson	5–4	51% games	not enough data
Rita Fordiani + Randy Johnson	4–5	45% games	not enough data
Alison Taunton-Rigby + Ivan Loukovnikov	2–5	45% games	not enough data
Ivan Loukovnikov + Eileen Pollack	1–6	43% games	not enough data
Marcy Buckler + Tom Conroy	2–4	49% games	not enough data

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

—

Tom Conroy

38W–33L career · 4 lines in 2024

<1%40%60%

3.54

—

Ivan Loukovnikov

28W–31L career · 4 lines in 2024

<1%58%42%

3.47

—

Marcy Buckler

119W–50L career · 2 lines in 2024

<1%76%24%

3.40

—

Patricia O'Hagan

81W–41L career · 1 line in 2024

1%86%14%

3.35

3.5

Andrzej Niemierko

51W–82L career · type A · 5 lines in 2024

1%86%13%

3.34

—

Ralph Pinto

26W–38L career · 4 lines in 2024

1%87%12%

3.34

—

Rita Fordiani

97W–107L career · 3 lines in 2024

3%92%5%

3.27

3.5

Alison Taunton-Rigby

30W–60L career · 2 lines in 2024

not enough data

—

Eileen Pollack

39W–63L career · 3 lines in 2024

37%63%<1%

3.04

—

Katharine Zupan

23W–46L career · 2 lines in 2024

38%61%<1%

3.04

—

Ewa Niemierko

23W–59L career · 6 lines in 2024

7%91%2%

2.71

—

Howard Schwartz

6W–12L career · 2 lines in 2024

not enough data

—

Jim Hutchinson

22W–39L career · 1 line in 2024

not enough data

—

Joanne Schwartz

13W–20L career · 3 lines in 2024

not enough data

—

Randy Johnson

18W–34L career · 2 lines in 2024

not enough data

—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.