Teams

PLEASANTON 18MX7.0A

2024 MIXED 18&Over · 18&Over MX7.0

20 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-01-27vs MONTE VISTA HS 18MX7.0ALost 01
L#2 DoublesGurupreet Chabda / Traci Rebiejo vs Clairessa Brown / Lloyd Hohenstein3-6, 4-6
2024-01-14vs GREENBROOK RS 18MX7.0AWon 10
W#2 DoublesStephanie Chamberlin / Gurupreet Chabda vs Kathlyn Powers / Kai Cummings7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18&Over MX7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Carlos Carbajal
published 4
3.63
Daniel Mathis
published 4
3.58
Dan Helmer
published 3.5
3.45
Gurupreet Chabda
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.40
3.36
Cindy Turner
published 3.5
3.35
KIM HOLLAND
published
3.17
Una Elias
published
3.14
Sterling Tai
published
3.13
Hui Chen
published
3.12
Bob Heeter
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.07
Kyle Jones
published
2.98
Tine Ankersen
published
2.91
Malou Matthew
published
2.85
Traci Rebiejo
published
2.52
Elaine Marshall
published
Jennifer Cross
published
Laura Rathkamp
published
Matthew Matrisian
published
Thomas Sheffield
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hui Chen + Bob Heeter0539% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carlos Carbajal
29W–17L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Daniel Mathis
17W–8L career · no lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
3.63
3.5
Dan Helmer
37W–14L career · type A · no lines in 2024
<1%28%72%
3.58
3.5
Gurupreet Chabda
67W–41L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
3.45
Stephanie Chamberlin
21W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%24%
3.40
3.5
Cindy Turner
20W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%16%
3.36
KIM HOLLAND
13W–12L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.35
Una Elias
6W–11L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
Sterling Tai
3W–11L career · no lines in 2024
>99%<1%<1%
3.14
Hui Chen
2W–19L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Bob Heeter
20W–22L career · 8 lines in 2024
20%79%<1%
3.12
Kyle Jones
9W–19L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.07
Tine Ankersen
8W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%57%43%
2.98
Malou Matthew
7W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
2.91
Traci Rebiejo
8W–12L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%15%
2.85
Elaine Marshall
8W–12L career · no lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
2.52
Jennifer Cross
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Laura Rathkamp
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Matthew Matrisian
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Thomas Sheffield
1W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.