Teams

Ellerbroek & Bliss - LifeTime

2025 Iowa Tri-Level League · 3.5-4.0-4.5 Women (West)

18 players · average NTRP 4.17 / IOWA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-08-06vs Olafson & Hill-Matthes - LifeTimeLost 12
L#1 DoublesEisha Nathwani / Angela Carl vs Heidi Hill-Matthes / Katie Kelleher1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMaria Fedorova / Tiffany Lavastida vs Korri ClarkWilt / Deana Hoganson1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesCristen Schipper / Renea Hagan vs Beth Eganhouse / Julie Merfeld6-2, 6-3
L#1 DoublesLibby Holder / Molly Kremer vs Terri Dial / Kristen Madsen1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesPamela Christoffers / Hannah Wong vs Holly Shortenhaus / Angela Torgerson2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJoan Gray / Cristen Schipper vs Sarah Zinn-Burggraaf / Sonja Heying6-1, 6-3
2025-07-23vs Olafson & Hill-Matthes - LifeTimeWon 21
L#1 DoublesEisha Nathwani / Molly Kremer vs Katie Kelleher / Alexandra Scott4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPamela Christoffers / Hannah Wong vs Jocelyn Fink / Deana Hoganson6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRee Greteman / Heidi Snedegar vs Beth Eganhouse / Julie Merfeld6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 DoublesMolly Kremer / Allison Davidson Motoyama vs Leah Taylor / Terri Dial7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTiffany Lavastida / Hannah Wong vs Meagan Rietz / Heather Ditsworth2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesCristen Schipper / Sara van Wyngarden vs Amy Upright / Calla Whipp6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2025-07-14vs Olafson & Hill-Matthes - LifeTimeLost 12
L#1 DoublesMary Ellerbroek / Libby Holder vs Katie Kelleher / Alexandra Scott6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesWillow Bauer / Maria Fedorova vs Jocelyn Fink / Dina Dulaney6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesRee Greteman / Renea Hagan vs Danita Olafson / Julie Merfeld6-3, 6-0
L#1 DoublesAllison Davidson Motoyama / Faith Bliss vs Terri Dial / Brynn Reichardt4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesWillow Bauer / Hannah Wong vs Cara O'Neill / Heather Ditsworth6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJoan Gray / Renea Hagan vs Sarah Zinn-Burggraaf / Sonja Heying5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2025-06-18vs Olafson & Hill-Matthes - LifeTimeWon 21
W#1 DoublesMolly Kremer / Allison Davidson Motoyama vs Alexandra Scott / Korri ClarkWilt6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAngela Carl / Willow Bauer vs Rebecca Studer / Becky Flander5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesSara van Wyngarden / Ree Greteman vs Danita Olafson / Beth Eganhouse6-2, 6-1
L#1 DoublesLibby Holder / Allison Davidson Motoyama vs Terri Dial / Brynn Reichardt7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesWillow Bauer / Pamela Christoffers vs Meagan Rietz / Holly Shortenhaus4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJoan Gray / Cristen Schipper vs Calla Whipp / Amy Upright6-1, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.5-4.0-4.5 Women (West)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Shortenhaus & Ditsworth - Southwoods5315924198
2Ellerbroek & Bliss - LifeTime44111330214
3Olafson & Hill-Matthes - LifeTime35101433235

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Allison Davidson Motoyama
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
3.76
Faith Bliss
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.56
Hannah Wong
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.49
Cristen Schipper
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.44
Mary Ellerbroek
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.44
Libby Holder
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.36
Molly Kremer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.34
Willow Bauer
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
3.33
Sara van Wyngarden
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Pamela Christoffers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Joan Gray
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.29
Angela Carl
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.27
Renea Hagan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.19
Ree Greteman
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.18
Maria Fedorova
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Eisha Nathwani
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Heidi Snedegar
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.03
Tiffany Lavastida
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allison Davidson Motoyama + Molly Kremer5074% games+35.0% vs expected
Mary Ellerbroek + Faith Bliss8261% games+12.7% vs expected
Joan Gray + Renea Hagan24361% games+4.6% vs expected
Heidi Snedegar + Sara van Wyngarden8163% games+4.5% vs expected
Joan Gray + Tiffany Lavastida7452% games+0.8% vs expected
Joan Gray + Heidi Snedegar7653% games−2.4% vs expected
Maria Fedorova + Pamela Christoffers4256% gamesnot enough data
Ree Greteman + Sara van Wyngarden4166% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Allison Davidson Motoyama
37W–13L career · 8 lines in 2025
20%79%<1%
4.12
Faith Bliss
20W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.76
Hannah Wong
5W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.56
4
Cristen Schipper
69W–31L career · 8 lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
3.49
Mary Ellerbroek
16W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
Libby Holder
16W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
Molly Kremer
18W–22L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.36
Willow Bauer
25W–16L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
Sara van Wyngarden
40W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
Pamela Christoffers
28W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Joan Gray
71W–27L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.32
4
Angela Carl
9W–40L career · 2 lines in 2025
93%7%<1%
3.29
Renea Hagan
75W–47L career · 6 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Ree Greteman
31W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.19
Maria Fedorova
22W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Eisha Nathwani
5W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Heidi Snedegar
69W–35L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.08
Tiffany Lavastida
22W–47L career · 2 lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.03

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.