Teams

Press/GR 6.0 X 18s

2025 TUL MIXED 18 & Over League · 6.0 MIXED

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-07-11vs Lott 6.0/FRSplit 11
L#1 DoublesChad King / Stacie King vs Ron Sills / Noelle Kilgore2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSarah Washatka / Brandon Washatka vs Bryce Torres / Ashley Torres0-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-06-29vs Thompson/GR 18s 6.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesAmber Jennings / Ronald Becker vs Melissa Nail / John Thompson6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSarah Washatka / Brandon Washatka vs Sandy Thompson / Austin Sumrall6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJulie Hudson / Chris Atherton vs Leigh Roy / Jess Roy6-3, 6-2
2025-06-20vs Troyke/SHWon 30
W#1 DoublesAmber Jennings / Zack Jennings vs Whitney Bingham / Josh Stearns6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesStacie King / Chad King vs Maggie Yar / MIKE MEARS6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJulie Hudson / Kent Hudson vs Amanda Stidham / Keith Auer6-3, 7-6
2025-06-15vs Winslow/LFSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJulie Hudson / Kent Hudson vs Shayle Finch / Roger Acebo5-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesAmber Jennings / Zack Jennings vs Katie Raper-Cavener / Jeffrey Owen7-5, 6-2
2025-06-06vs Kuehn/PHLost 12
L#1 DoublesStacie King / Ronald Becker vs Rhonda Hoffman / Todd Hoffman5-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesSarah Washatka / Brandon Washatka vs Doyle Bishop / Lucy Bishop4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJulie Hudson / Kent Hudson vs Shawn Grant / Tiffany McCrackin7-5, 0-6, 0-1
2025-06-01vs Hayes 6.0/ISWon 21
W#1 DoublesAmber Jennings / Ronald Becker vs Barb Evans / Josh Hinkle2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSarah Washatka / Brandon Washatka vs Madison Hayes / Aaron Hayes6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesStacie King / Chris Atherton vs Sheila Cooper / Kevin Cooper7-6, 6-1
2025-05-21vs OKWC/Schmidt 18&over6.0XLost 12
W#1 DoublesAmber Jennings / Zack Jennings vs David Schmidt / Abby Kurin7-6, 2-1
L#2 DoublesChad King / Stacie King vs Crystal Maguire / James Lorenzen6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDonell Trinh / Sandy Greuel vs Rodolfo Franco / Fernanda Franco6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2025-05-11vs Hunt//LFWon 21
L#1 DoublesStacie King / Chad King vs Allison Creel / Brandon Kelley3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAmber Jennings / Zack Jennings vs Brooke Beguin / Jeremy Beguin6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJulie Hudson / Kent Hudson vs Kristin Seifried / Kurt Seifried6-1, 6-2
2025-05-02vs Kim Hendrix/LF 6.0XWon 30
W#1 DoublesAmber Jennings / Zack Jennings vs Amber Hendrix / Todd Spangler7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesStacie King / Chad King vs Karen Santee / John Santee6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJulie Hudson / Kent Hudson vs Mckayla Hendrix / Chris Lilly6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 6.0 MIXED
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OKWC/Schmidt 18&over6.0X8120719196
2Hayes 6.0/IS7218923246
3Press/GR 6.0 X 18s54171025218
4Hunt//LF54141330249
5Thompson/GR 18s 6.045131433244
6Troyke/SH45111637261
7Winslow/LF36111636268
8Kim Hendrix/LF 6.0X0932451319

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
Zack Jennings
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.03
Ronald Becker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.98
Chris Atherton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.84
Sarah Washatka
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Donell Trinh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Brandon Washatka
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Sandy Greuel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Kent Hudson
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.62
Julie Hudson
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.61
Chad King
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
Stacie King
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Washatka + Brandon Washatka10555% games+10.3% vs expected
Chad King + Stacie King5457% gamesnot enough data
Julie Hudson + Kent Hudson3256% gamesnot enough data
Ronald Becker + Sarah Washatka224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Zack Jennings
28W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%17%83%
3.12
Ronald Becker
55W–55L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Chris Atherton
9W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98
Sarah Washatka
38W–35L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
2.84
3
Donell Trinh
23W–31L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Brandon Washatka
13W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sandy Greuel
31W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
Kent Hudson
6W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.67
Julie Hudson
12W–3L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%19%81%
2.62
3
Chad King
9W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.61
Stacie King
12W–19L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.