Teams

Tennis Sharks- Aguiar

2025 Loudoun Doubles Winter Women · Loudoun Doubles Winter 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.43 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-01vs NittaLost 02
L#1 DoublesKaryn DeVito / Marguerite McFadden vs Julianne Nitta / Devika Eddula2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesSharon Petri / Sarah Wiederkehr vs Lisa Kottmann / Chandra Bittner2-6, 4-6
2025-03-27vs McManusLost 03
L#1 DoublesKaryn DeVito / Marguerite McFadden vs Jill Holloman / Caroline Mia Lee4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBrittany Persino / Nancy Trainer vs Anne Marie Randolph / Jennifer Annessa6-7, 0-2
L#3 DoublesSharon Petri / Sarah Wiederkehr vs Joanne Good / Marla Sue Jackson1-6, 1-6
2025-03-24vs 3.5 Fireballs- MarcotteWon 21
W#1 DoublesSmita Aguiar / Kari Whitney vs Stephanie Bozarth / Kristi Nault4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKaryn DeVito / Griffin Mauk vs Sibyll Jones / Kimberly Stepherson6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesBrittany Persino / Kim Whittaker vs Angela Carbone / Joan-Marie Turchiano1-6, 5-7
2025-03-19vs Martin - StoneleighWon 30
W#1 DoublesMarguerite McFadden / Nancy Trainer vs Susan Cooke / Katie Budnyk6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesKaryn DeVito / Kari Whitney vs Bree Ayotte / Marci Welsh6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSharon Petri / Sarah Wiederkehr vs Dorothy Beach / Patricia Yriart7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2025-03-07vs McCarter - Lucky StringsWon 20
W#1 DoublesGriffin Mauk / Kari Whitney vs Hannah Auyang / Christina Treacy6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesNancy Trainer / Kim Whittaker vs Karin Arnold / Marisa Zaneis6-4, 6-2
2025-02-13vs RC Schaefer/BrillLost 12
W#1 DoublesNancy Trainer / Kari Whitney vs Anne Flam / Natalia Hozdevila2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBrittany Persino / Karyn DeVito vs Coni Schaefer / Michelle Tenhaeff4-6, 4-3
L#3 DoublesEffie Hoffman / Sharon Petri vs Kimberly Murray / Christine Feit1-6, 3-6
2025-01-27vs Double Trouble- McMullenLost 12
L#1 DoublesGriffin Mauk / Kim Whittaker vs Margaret Amy Flaherty / Laurie Peacock3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKaryn DeVito / Brittany Persino vs Stephanie Frauen / Lindsey Frye3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesSharon Petri / Effie Hoffman vs Julia Moss / Daniela Silitra6-4, 6-3
2025-01-09vs Mood Swings- SmithWon 20
W#2 DoublesSmita Aguiar / Marguerite McFadden vs Kate Putt / Kerry Smith6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSharon Petri / Sarah Wiederkehr vs Kelly Stanley / Angela Tomaszewski3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Doubles Winter 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Griffin Mauk
published
3.58
Nancy Trainer
published
3.41
Smita Aguiar
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.39
Kari Whitney
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.38
Karyn DeVito
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Kim Whittaker
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Marguerite McFadden
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.23
Effie Hoffman
published
3.07
Brittany Persino
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.84
Sharon Petri
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Sarah Wiederkehr
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karyn DeVito + Brittany Persino41143% games+3.4% vs expected
Smita Aguiar + Karyn DeVito4646% games+2.1% vs expected
Kim Whittaker + Karyn DeVito2641% games+2.1% vs expected
Marguerite McFadden + Karyn DeVito261653% games+1.2% vs expected
Smita Aguiar + Kari Whitney6652% games−1.8% vs expected
Smita Aguiar + Griffin Mauk2345% games−8.5% vs expected
Kim Whittaker + Brittany Persino9850% games−15.5% vs expected
Kim Whittaker + Smita Aguiar4842% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Griffin Mauk
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.81
Nancy Trainer
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.58
3.5
Smita Aguiar
60W–69L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%73%26%
3.41
3.5
Kari Whitney
40W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%78%21%
3.39
3.5
Karyn DeVito
141W–116L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.38
3.5
Kim Whittaker
62W–53L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Marguerite McFadden
95W–75L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Effie Hoffman
12W–8L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Brittany Persino
43W–49L career · 4 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
3
Sharon Petri
73W–89L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
Sarah Wiederkehr
3W–15L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.