Teams

JJones (Life Time)

2022 Singles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Singles 3.0 Men - Tues PM

3 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-08-02vs JBrasch (PCC)Lost 01
L#2 SinglesDaniel Malecki vs Shaun Kruse2-6, 3-6
2022-07-12vs CCotte (Queens)Lost 01
L#2 SinglesDaniel Malecki vs Julius Fernandez0-6, 3-6
2022-06-21Lost 01
L#1 SinglesDaniel Malecki vs Peter Mayo2-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Singles 3.0 Men - Tues PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Jeff Cohen
published
3.41
Jeff Buturff
published
3.21
Daniel Malecki
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeff Cohen
23W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.41
Jeff Buturff
22W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
3.41
3.5
Daniel Malecki
39W–64L career · 3 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.