Teams

EPERKINS

2022 Cap Spring USTA 40 & over · 3.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-09vs LWilliams40+Lost 01
L#1 DoublesEdward Perkins / Stephen Kuss vs John Gouveia / JP Phinney6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2022-05-02vs TKovesWon 20
W#1 DoublesDoug Silverman / Bryan Lowrance vs Albert Ahr / David Lee6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesStephen Kuss / Paul Baggett vs GEORGE ELLISON / Marshall Lamb6-2, 6-1
2022-04-28vs IDMearesWon 10
W#2 DoublesDoug Silverman / Bryan Lowrance vs Brad Killian / Charlie Foster7-5, 6-2
2022-04-25Lost 01
L#2 DoublesBrad Aderhold / Paul Baggett vs GREGORY WEISS / Matthew Hilbert1-6, 4-6
2022-04-04vs CEvansTurner40Split 11
L#1 DoublesDoug Silverman / John Perkins vs Mark Unruh / Scott Hoffman1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesEdward Perkins / Stephen Kuss vs Charles Brignac / Bert Clancey1-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-03-28vs JWaychoffLost 02
L#1 DoublesDoug Silverman / Steve Powell vs Darshan Patel / Brian Kaulback2-2
L#2 DoublesLee Ritsema / Stephen Kuss vs Chad Sokol / Jeff Waychoff3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-03-19vs JRichardson/SevenOaksWon 20
W#2 DoublesStephen Kuss / Lee Ritsema vs Michael Klein / Greg Baur4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSteve Powell / Doug Silverman vs Jason DeGroff / David Allen6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Camilo Pena
published 4
3.61
Doug Silverman
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Brad Aderhold
published 3.5
3.18
Bryan Lowrance
published 3.5
3.06
Edward Perkins
published 3.5
3.03
Wes Lippman
published
3.01
Paul Baggett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.97
Stephen Kuss
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.96
Lee Ritsema
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephen Kuss + Doug Silverman4352% games+1.5% vs expected
Stephen Kuss + Paul Baggett303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Camilo Pena
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Doug Silverman
99W–41L career · type A · 5 lines in 2022
<1%19%81%
3.61
3.5
Brad Aderhold
no matches on record · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Bryan Lowrance
2W–7L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Edward Perkins
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.06
Wes Lippman
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.03
3
Paul Baggett
30W–24L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%47%53%
3.01
3.5
Stephen Kuss
28W–36L career · 5 lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
2.97
Lee Ritsema
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
61%39%<1%
2.96

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.