Teams

Avila Mutiny - R. Cypriano

2025 Hillsborough Combo 50 & Over · 8.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-11-02vs River Hills - F. WuLost 02
L#1 DoublesRoger Cypriano / Jim Stefan vs Chris Canfield / William Rhodes4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Teixeira / Albert Alhadeff vs Manuel Alvarez / James Mason1-6, 1-6
2025-10-26vs HCC Nomads - D. McGovernSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRoger Cypriano / Robert Carpenter vs Samuel Biller / Michael Laccabue6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMichael Teixeira / Jim Stefan vs Daren McGovern / Scott McGovern1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-10-12vs River Hills - F. WuLost 02
L#2 DoublesMichael Teixeira / Martin Revello vs Scott Schuhriemen / Charles Constantine3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRoger Cypriano / Jim Stefan vs Chris New / William Rhodes3-6, 2-6
2025-10-12vs River Hills - F. WuLost 03
L#1 DoublesRoger Cypriano / Paul Zack vs Scott Schuhriemen / Jeffrey Stern1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Teixeira / Barney Bailey vs Charles Gauthier / Ricardo Ramirez0-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSean Vickery / Robert Carpenter vs Mark Kanarek / Fred Wu4-6, 2-6
2025-10-05vs HCC Nomads - D. McGovernLost 02
L#1 DoublesJim Stefan / Paul Zack vs Daren McGovern / Chris Ricketts5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Teixeira / Martin Revello vs Michael Laccabue / Matt Laccabue3-6, 4-6
2025-09-14vs HCC Nomads - D. McGovernSplit 11
W#2 DoublesAlbert Alhadeff / Michael Teixeira vs Christopher Hollingsworth / Chris Ricketts2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJim Stefan / Alvaro Rodriguez vs Erik Breitenbach / Ray Pasinski0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Paul Zack
published
3.77
Jim Stefan
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.77
Albert Alhadeff
published 4
3.77
Barney Bailey
published 4
3.59
Martin Revello
published
Michael Teixeira
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Roger Cypriano
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Sean Vickery
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Roger Cypriano + Jim Stefan224 matchesnot enough data
Michael Teixeira + Jim Stefan134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paul Zack
31W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.87
Jim Stefan
37W–48L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Albert Alhadeff
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Barney Bailey
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Martin Revello
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
26%73%<1%
3.59
Michael Teixeira
12W–14L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Roger Cypriano
29W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sean Vickery
21W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.