Teams

GT Bray Racquettes

2022 Sarasota Adult 40 & Over Weekday · 4.0 W Tuesday

5 players · average NTRP 3.67 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-24vs LWR NicholsonLost 01
L#2 DoublesCynthia Norwood / Carrie Scalcucci vs Marcia Frost / Sandy Severs4-6, 1-6
2022-05-17Won 20
W#1 SinglesCelia Pena vs Patricia Dipierro6-4
W#3 DoublesMary Hennessy / Cynthia Norwood vs Susie Lentile / Jane Meaney1-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-05-10vs Laurel Oak Continental CrewLost 12
W#1 DoublesRoda Rucks / Celia Pena vs Tanya Keith / Penny Durham6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesCarrie Scalcucci vs Courtney Rosenthal6-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMary Hennessy / Victoria Sanchez vs Yudi Carpenter / Carrie Walsh6-3, 0-6, 0-1
2022-05-03vs SARASOTA - Longwood Wilson-SnyderLost 01
L#1 SinglesCelia Pena vs Deanna Allard2-6, 2-6
2022-04-26vs LWR EnglanderWon 20
W#1 SinglesCarrie Scalcucci vs Patricia Boehm6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesVictoria Sanchez / Mary Hennessy vs Lisa Tschetter / Sandra Barkey7-6, 6-3
2022-04-19vs LBK Public AllenLost 02
L#1 DoublesVictoria Sanchez / Cathy Powell vs Sheliah Gruber / Elaine Jessop4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesCarrie Scalcucci vs Karen Nejdawi5-7, 4-6
2022-04-12vs Laurel Oak Better Late Than NeverWon 30
W#1 SinglesCelia Pena vs Haven Beach6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMary Hennessy / Sandra Cook vs Julie Sparma / Teri Sayre7-6, 7-5
W#3 DoublesCarrie Scalcucci / Maura Binecki vs Linda Wheeler / Shelley Heller6-3, 6-2
2022-04-05vs LBK Club LidskyLost 01
L#1 DoublesVictoria Sanchez / Celia Pena vs Sandra Duryea / Sue Campbell3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 W Tuesday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Celia Pena
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.22
Beth Arndt
published 3.5
3.02
Carrie Scalcucci
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Mary Hennessy
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Victoria Sanchez
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carrie Scalcucci + Beth Arndt123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Celia Pena
68W–59L career · 5 lines in 2022
19%80%<1%
3.61
3.5
Beth Arndt
6W–10L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Carrie Scalcucci
42W–83L career · 5 lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
3.02
Mary Hennessy
58W–34L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Victoria Sanchez
7W–24L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.