Teams

Jung-CC

2026 CORTA USTA Adult 55 & Over - Spring · Men 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-02vs CORTA/Jay PeaseLost 03
L#1 DoublesHank Austin / Brad Brooks vs Michael Stewart / Keith Trawick5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMark Hudson / Roy Cronise vs Jay Pease / Steve Swords0-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMark Smith / Ronald Beck vs Kerry Philip Baker / Mark Sexton2-6, 5-7
2026-04-25vs CORTA/Jay PeaseLost 12
L#1 DoublesJeff Arrington / Paul Graham vs Kerry Philip Baker / Todd Lee3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesWalter Henry / Ki Sung vs Jay Pease / Michael Stewart1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKen McCoskey / Ramon Scott vs Mark Sexton / Anderson Philips6-4, 6-4
2026-04-18vs CORTA/Jay PeaseWon 21
L#1 DoublesJeff Arrington / Sungwoo Jung vs Michael Gunter / Keith Trawick1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesHank Austin / Antonio Hamilton vs Anderson Philips / Todd Lee1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRamon Scott / Mark Hudson vs Steve Swords / Kevin Boykin6-3, 6-3
2026-04-11vs CORTA/Jay PeaseLost 12
L#1 DoublesRonald Beck / James Dorchak vs Kerry Philip Baker / Steve Swords4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesHank Austin / Brad Brooks vs Kevin Boykin / Michael Bruder3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKi Sung / Paul Graham vs Jay Pease / Brad Waddell3-6, 2-6
2026-04-04vs CORTA/Jay PeaseLost 03
L#1 DoublesJeff Arrington / Ronald Beck vs David Burke / Michael Gunter6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBrad Brooks / Roy Cronise vs Michael Stewart / Mark Sexton4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAntonio Hamilton / Walter Henry vs Keith Trawick / Brad Waddell2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-03-28vs CORTA/Jay PeaseLost 03
L#1 DoublesRamon Scott / Ken McCoskey vs Glenn Davis / Keith Trawick5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBrad Brooks / Sungwoo Jung vs Michael Stewart / Mark Sexton4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesHank Austin / Ki Sung vs David Gunter / Jay Pease5-7, 2-6
2026-03-18vs CORTA/Jay PeaseLost 03
L#1 DoublesRamon Scott / Sungwoo Jung vs Kerry Philip Baker / Steve Swords3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAntonio Hamilton / Roy Cronise vs David Gunter / David Burke1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJames Dorchak / Paul Graham vs Glenn Davis / Michael Bruder3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · Men 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Jung-CC1641736234

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Ronald Beck
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.60
Ki Sung
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.54
James Dorchak
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.51
Ken McCoskey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.49
Antonio Hamilton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.47
Sungwoo Jung
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.46
Jeff Arrington
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Brad Brooks
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.30
Roy Cronise
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Ramon Scott
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.13
Hank Austin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.13
Walter Henry
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.05
Paul Graham
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ramon Scott + Ken McCoskey2640% games−3.7% vs expected
Jeff Arrington + Ronald Beck4159% gamesnot enough data
Paul Graham + Antonio Hamilton1437% gamesnot enough data
Jeff Arrington + Ken McCoskey213 matchesnot enough data
Ramon Scott + Ronald Beck303 matchesnot enough data
Brad Brooks + James Dorchak123 matchesnot enough data
Antonio Hamilton + Ken McCoskey033 matchesnot enough data
Walter Henry + Ki Sung123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ronald Beck
14W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
Ki Sung
8W–25L career · 3 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.60
James Dorchak
4W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
3.54
Ken McCoskey
9W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
3.51
4
Antonio Hamilton
9W–30L career · 3 lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
3.49
Sungwoo Jung
17W–38L career · 3 lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
3.47
Jeff Arrington
24W–40L career · 3 lines in 2026
61%39%<1%
3.46
4
Brad Brooks
27W–44L career · 4 lines in 2026
80%20%<1%
3.38
Roy Cronise
8W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
92%8%<1%
3.30
Ramon Scott
30W–33L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%3%97%
3.25
Hank Austin
4W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%17%83%
3.13
Walter Henry
16W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.13
Paul Graham
15W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%35%65%
3.05

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.