Teams

Brookfield CC (Kay Moody)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 18 & Over Weekday Women - Regular · 4.0 Women (Sonya Peel)

17 players · average NTRP 4.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2023-11-30Won 10
W#2 SinglesAmanda Gallagher vs Julie King5-7, 7-5, 3-0
2023-11-09Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAmanda Gallagher / Mattea Leonardi vs Amy McDaniel / Natalie Storm2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women (Sonya Peel) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Amanda Gallagher
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4.5
3.92
Kay Moody
published
3.87
Amy Strahan
published 4
3.78
Shawn Dovale
published
3.75
Jackie Blyth
published
3.75
Tamara Watkins
published
3.73
Julie Hubbard
published
3.72
Paula Hope
published
3.66
Suzanne Ashton
published
3.66
Jessica Brighton
published
3.65
Amy Patrick
published 4
3.62
Jean Kahn
published
3.62
Tara Fust
published
3.54
Rene Beavers
published
3.50
Gail Parks
published
3.21
Debbie Turner
published 3.5
Re'An Geis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tamara Watkins + Kay Moody27962% games+5.0% vs expected
Julie Hubbard + Tara Fust6452% games−0.8% vs expected
Paula Hope + Jackie Blyth5452% games−1.7% vs expected
Tara Fust + Kay Moody2445% games−2.8% vs expected
Jean Kahn + Rene Beavers353253% games−4.7% vs expected
Tara Fust + Jackie Blyth3443% games−4.7% vs expected
Kay Moody + Paula Hope3450% games−10.5% vs expected
Jean Kahn + Paula Hope2443% games−14.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Amanda Gallagher
12W–13L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kay Moody
112W–43L career · no lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Amy Strahan
27W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%18%
3.87
Shawn Dovale
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
Jackie Blyth
16W–22L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
Tamara Watkins
45W–17L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
Julie Hubbard
19W–26L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
Paula Hope
43W–43L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
Suzanne Ashton
11W–13L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.66
Jessica Brighton
50W–17L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.66
4
Amy Patrick
7W–14L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.65
Jean Kahn
52W–48L career · no lines in 2024
19%80%<1%
3.62
Tara Fust
15W–21L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.62
Rene Beavers
43W–37L career · no lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
3.54
Gail Parks
13W–25L career · no lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.50
3.5
Debbie Turner
16W–43L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
Re'An Geis
16W–14L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.