Teams

Reasner 7.5 Combo

2023 Southern Combo Doubles 55 & Over - HSV · 7.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.83 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-09-14Won 10
W#3 DoublesGregory Edwards / Thomas Hargrove vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-08-30vs Reaves 7.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesThomas Hargrove / Akram Haggag vs Tim Bishop / Paul Carothers6-3, 6-3
2023-08-29vs Nosky 7.5 55+Won 10
W#2 DoublesDANIEL FRITH / Thomas Hargrove vs Bruce Pollard / Blake Herrin6-3, 6-0
2023-08-24vs HU - KingLost 01
L#1 DoublesAkram Haggag / Thomas Hargrove vs John Grace / Boyd Berryhill1-6, 4-6
2023-08-21vs Nosky 7.5 55+Won 10
W#1 DoublesAkram Haggag / Thomas Hargrove vs Patton Watson / Hill Rowan6-4, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
DANIEL FRITH
published 4
3.65
Douglas Counter
published
3.51
Jon Scallan
published
3.40
Ronnie McFarling
published
3.29
Tom Estes
published
3.28
Akram Haggag
published 4
3.27
Michael Perry
published
3.16
Thomas Hargrove
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.16
Dennis Reasner
published 3.5
Richard Allison
published
Richard Salling
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tom Estes + Dennis Reasner1741% games−2.2% vs expected
Tom Estes + Michael Perry2351% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
DANIEL FRITH
56W–27L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
Douglas Counter
20W–11L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.65
Jon Scallan
8W–9L career · no lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.51
Ronnie McFarling
28W–28L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%24%
3.40
Tom Estes
14W–20L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
4
Akram Haggag
16W–34L career · no lines in 2023
94%6%<1%
3.28
Michael Perry
24W–18L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Thomas Hargrove
87W–114L career · 5 lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Dennis Reasner
15W–38L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.16
Richard Allison
0W–12L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Richard Salling
3W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.