Teams

FLYHS LANE

2025 USTA MIXED 40 & OVER - SOCO · MIXED 6.0 - 40 & OVER - SOCO

11 players · average NTRP 3.10 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-07-06vs CSRC PECKWon 10
W#2 DoublesJerry Wilson / Tisha Hickerson vs Zach Barker / Andrea Pazdera6-3, 6-2
2025-06-29vs CSRC ROSSWon 10
W#3 DoublesDiogo Carvalho / Emilia Carvalho vs Brian Abraham / Denice Yates7-5, 6-2
2025-06-22vs CSCC PEPPERWon 10
W#2 DoublesJerry Wilson / Melissa Biewenga vs Olav Saboe / Carol Pepper5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2025-06-15vs CSRC PECKLost 01
L#3 DoublesEmilia Carvalho / Diogo Carvalho vs Jennifer Gonzales / Scott Peck6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2025-06-08vs CSRC ROSSWon 10
W#3 DoublesDiogo Carvalho / Emilia Carvalho vs Ceanne Coleman / Steven Rubin6-1, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 6.0 - 40 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Ken Lane
published
3.57
Diogo Carvalho
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.13
Tisha Hickerson
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.97
Amelia Prado
published 3
2.82
Holly Lane
published
2.72
Lindsey Solko
published
2.65
Melissa Biewenga
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.61
Kelly Greiner
published
2.37
Emilia Carvalho
published
Jerry Wilson
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Antonio Henrique Batista De Moura + Amelia Prado2551% games+19.9% vs expected
Melissa Biewenga + Diogo Carvalho4158% games+11.4% vs expected
Ken Lane + Holly Lane8360% games+11.0% vs expected
Diogo Carvalho + Emilia Carvalho2745% games−9.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ken Lane
34W–13L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.77
3.5
Diogo Carvalho
55W–37L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.57
3
Tisha Hickerson
47W–31L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.13
3
Amelia Prado
33W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
Holly Lane
19W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Antonio Henrique Batista De Moura
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lindsey Solko
18W–29L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Melissa Biewenga
35W–34L career · 1 line in 2025
14%85%1%
2.65
Kelly Greiner
7W–19L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.61
Emilia Carvalho
15W–13L career · no lines in 2025
0%82%18%
2.37
Jerry Wilson
15W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.