← Teams

MAC-Milan/McClendon

2020 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Lisa Howlett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
—
Maureen Mader
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.22
Michele Desmarais
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.18
Peg McClendon
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.76
Dorothy Cofield
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Results6 ties
2019-11-24Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesPeg McClendon / Jean Jensen vs Susan Eldridge / Merry Pettis6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMichele Desmarais / Anne Milan vs Michelle Ruby / Sheila Schmidt7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAnna Maria Savinar / Maureen Mader vs Rita Pearson / Suzy Carton6-1, 6-2
2019-11-16Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesKathy Pienovi / Lisa Howlett vs Marianne Conroy / Kathleen Budnick6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesAnne Milan / Michele Desmarais vs Julia Rea / Patty Mamula4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2019-11-09Won 2–0
W#2 DoublesAnne Fernando / Maureen Mader vs Jeane Anastas / Fran Swanson6-0, 7-5
W#3 DoublesDorothy Cofield / Jean Jensen vs Jennifer McKittrick / Cindy Yablok6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2019-11-02Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesDorothy Cofield / Peg McClendon vs Marcie Price / Bernadette Widolff7-5, 0-0
2019-09-28Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesLisa Howlett / Kathy Pienovi vs Starr Hornor / Shirley Derby6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAnne Milan / Peg McClendon vs Julie Arness / Linda Underwood6-2, 6-3
2019-09-15Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesKathy Pienovi / Lisa Howlett vs Eileen Hart / Stephanie Arnheim6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesPeg McClendon / Patricia Landye vs Sandi Martes / Kathy Johnson6-3, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Lisa Howlett
31W–21L career · type S
6%91%4%
3.26
3.5
Maureen Mader
20W–12L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Michele Desmarais
56W–45L career
7%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Peg McClendon
54W–53L career
5%95%0%
3.18
3
Dorothy Cofield
82W–134L career · type A
2%97%1%
2.76

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.