Teams

YMCA Greystone - Bradford

2026 B'ham Fall - Adult 55 & Over, Saturday · 4.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.92 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-12-27vs Life Time - HallLost 02
L#1 DoublesDavid Bradford / Sam Wasko vs Jason Mann / Michael Mann6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesHammond Reynolds / Charles Giles vs Ryan Hall / David Daniels6-7, 2-6
2025-12-22vs YMCA Mt. Brook - SansingWon 21
W#1 DoublesSam Wasko / David Bradford vs David Condon / Steve Shotts7-5, 7-6
W#2 DoublesHammond Reynolds / Charles Giles vs Clifford Lumpkin / Terry Turner6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMark Barron / Butch Barker vs Rusty Sansing / Keith Andress6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-12-17vs YMCA Mt. Brook - SansingWon 21
W#1 DoublesSam Wasko / Charles Giles vs Terry Turner / Clifford Lumpkin6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesButch Barker / Gary Rutledge vs Rusty Sansing / Keith Andress4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesDavid Bradford / Mark Barron vs Gil Brown / Russell Johnson6-3, 6-2
2025-10-11vs Life Time - HallWon 20
W#1 DoublesMark Barron / Hammond Reynolds vs Ryan Hall / Andy Winebrenner6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDavid Bradford / Sam Wasko vs Rafael Perez / Michael Mann6-1, 6-4
2025-09-20vs Life Time - HallWon 30
W#1 DoublesDavid Bradford / Mark Barron vs Rafael Perez / William Reiser6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesSam Wasko / Charles Giles vs Michael Mann / Jason Mann6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHammond Reynolds / Bruce Sale vs Peter Wright / Kent Bailey6-3, 6-1
2025-09-13vs YMCA Mt. Brook - SansingWon 30
W#1 DoublesDavid Bradford / Sam Wasko vs Russell Johnson / Rusty Sansing6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMark Barron / Gary Rutledge vs William Belski / Keith Andress6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesM Drew Williamson / Bruce Sale vs Clifford Lumpkin / George Casey6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Bruce Sale
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.76
David Bradford
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
Gary Rutledge
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Hammond Reynolds
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.66
Mark Barron
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.62
Butch Barker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.54
Charles Giles
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
M Drew Williamson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Butch Barker + David Bradford4167% gamesnot enough data
Charles Giles + Hammond Reynolds213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bruce Sale
3W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%5%
3.78
4
David Bradford
38W–28L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Gary Rutledge
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Hammond Reynolds
29W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
3.74
Mark Barron
17W–21L career · 5 lines in 2026
11%88%<1%
3.66
3.5
Butch Barker
30W–26L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
<1%17%83%
3.62
4
Charles Giles
27W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
3.54
M Drew Williamson
3W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.