Teams

SAC-Barnatan/Chen

2020 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.64 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Cassia Carpio
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 4.5
3.47
Jian Xu
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.35
Timothea Barnatan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Lyann Nguyen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.21
Parul Saxena
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Patty Chen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Jamie Heberlein
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Shoully Mendyke
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 0
Results10 ties
2020-02-16Split 22
L#1 DoublesLeslie Rosenberg / Jamie Heberlein vs Laura Laney / Peg McClendon6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesTimothea Barnatan / Jenna Dornblaser vs Lisa Littleton / Lisa Schaller6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesCassia Carpio vs Stephanie von Allmen6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesShoully Mendyke / Woohyung Kim vs Catherine Leedy / TERESA LAWHEAD2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2020-02-09Won 40
W#1 DoublesJian Xu / Lyann Nguyen vs Natalya Ramras / Jennifer Bane6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesCassia Carpio vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesJamie Heberlein vs Alyssa Heath6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJenna Dornblaser / Parul Saxena vs Pam Weider / Tina Clancy6-4, 6-4
2020-02-01Won 30
W#1 DoublesJian Xu / Lyann Nguyen vs Lynn Wagner / Melodie Seelbinder6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTimothea Barnatan / Leslie Rosenberg vs Nancy Duncan / Amy Hicks6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesPatty Chen / Woohyung Kim vs Teresa Darling / Patti Dybdahl6-4, 7-5
2020-01-18Won 40
W#1 DoublesJian Xu / Shoully Mendyke vs Mary Priester / Michelle Johnson6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJenna Dornblaser / Parul Saxena vs Theresa Sleight / Christa Mazariegos6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesCassia Carpio vs Lyndsey Matteson6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTimothea Barnatan / Patty Chen vs Karen Kraus / Sarah Larson6-2, 6-3
2020-01-11Won 40
W#1 DoublesCassia Carpio / Shoully Mendyke vs Annette Hill / Pamela Hughes6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJenna Dornblaser / Parul Saxena vs Reiko Maeda / Dar Dragoon7-6, 6-1
W#2 SinglesJamie Heberlein vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJian Xu / Patty Chen vs Jennifer Steward / Nina Bakos6-0, 6-3
2020-01-04Won 21
W#1 DoublesCassia Carpio / Shoully Mendyke vs Andrea Vicino / Anita Rockwell6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAleli Siruno / Lyann Nguyen vs Tonya Halog / Stephanie Arnheim6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesEvelyn Sun / Timothea Barnatan vs Alison Marr / Suki Birge6-4, 6-0
2019-12-14Won 10
W#1 DoublesRajan Madhusudan / Cassia Carpio vs Karen Walker / Rich Johnson6-1, 6-3
2019-12-14Lost 01
L#2 DoublesCharles Taguet / Jamie Heberlein vs Leah Buxman / Chris Collins6-2, 7-5
2019-12-13Won 10
W#3 DoublesSrinivasa Kanamatha / Patty Chen vs Joy Meyers / Henry Kofron6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2019-12-13Won 10
W#2 DoublesRajan Madhusudan / Cassia Carpio vs Chris Blevins / Jinquan Wu6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Cassia Carpio
256W–91L career
2%98%0%
4.12
3.5
Jian Xu
138W–56L career
0%88%12%
3.47
3.5
Timothea Barnatan
95W–117L career
0%98%2%
3.35
3.5
Lyann Nguyen
59W–44L career
not enough data
3.5
Parul Saxena
36W–43L career
2%98%0%
3.21
3.5
Patty Chen
59W–56L career
6%94%0%
3.15
3.5
Jamie Heberlein
45W–47L career
31%68%1%
3.05
0
Shoully Mendyke
31W–16L career
not enough data

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.