Teams

Blume - Genesis

2022 IA 18 & Over Adult League · 2.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.83 / IOWA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-03-26vs Benson 2.5 - DMGWon 20
W#1 DoublesAudra Bonner / Pam Kroh vs Kristin Rose / Lorie Rosebrook4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAshleysha Pujari vs Sabina Kneifl7-6, 6-1
2022-02-12vs Everett & ChampionLost 02
L#1 DoublesTera Jordan / Sarah Francis vs Candy Vandewater / Teri Everett1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMegan Brittain / Audra Bonner vs Diane Cortese / Lori Hanson2-6, 1-6
2022-02-05vs Everett & ChampionLost 02
L#1 DoublesJana Teachout / Deb Berger vs Teri Everett / Michelle Champion2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTera Jordan / Emilie Pohlman vs Laurine Raker / Linda Wilker6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2022-01-29vs Benson 2.5 - DMGLost 12
L#1 DoublesKate Brown / Audra Bonner vs Lorie Rosebrook / Anna DeWaay2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAshleysha Pujari vs Elizabeth Ariano6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMegan Brittain / Sarah Francis vs Tami Fletcher / Shannon Bischoff7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2021-12-18vs Benson 2.5 - DMGWon 20
W#1 DoublesPam Kroh / Jana Teachout vs Kristin Rose / Anna DeWaay6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTera Jordan / Mary Taylor vs Eileen Wixted / Patricia Hoffmann6-2, 6-4
2021-12-03vs Everett & ChampionSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKatelyn Lynch-Butcher / Emilie Pohlman vs Teri Everett / Linda Wilker2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesTera Jordan / Mary Taylor vs Michelle Champion / Laurine Raker6-4, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.45 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.88
Emilie Pohlman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Ashleysha Pujari
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.54
Pam Kroh
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.31
Megan Brittain
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.06
Audra Bonner
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Jana Teachout
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Tera Jordan
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Emilie Pohlman
18W–9L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Ashleysha Pujari
7W–9L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Pam Kroh
21W–26L career · 4 lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
2.54
Megan Brittain
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2022
0%93%7%
2.31
2.5
Audra Bonner
5W–11L career · 3 lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.06
Jana Teachout
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tera Jordan
6W–5L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.