Teams

Laredo Team A

Adult 40 & Over League · Women's 3.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-04-30vs Laredo Team BWon 31
W#1 DoublesMelissa Ahumada / Mayela Saad vs Xandra Minarro / Elidia Grubbs6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMaria Diez vs Barbara Mendez6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMarisela Canamar / Patricia Carranza vs MILERSY RODRIGUEZ / Nilda Garcia5-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesAlice Werstak / Minnie Dora Haynes Rodriguez vs Olivia Gonzalez / GABRIELA de LUNA6-3, 6-1
2026-04-28vs Laredo Team BWon 40
W#1 DoublesMayela Saad / Sonia Pena vs Nilda Garcia / MILERSY RODRIGUEZ6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesSara Lascari vs SARA VILLARREAL6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLizette Mora / SELINA TREVINO vs Mirian Mendoza / Elsa Pena6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAmelie Jane / Alice Werstak vs Barbara Mendez / Minerva Santos6-3, 6-2
2026-04-22vs Laredo Team BWon 31
L#1 DoublesMelissa Ahumada / Raquel Gomez vs MILERSY RODRIGUEZ / Nilda Garcia5-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesSara Lascari vs Barbara Mendez6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMarisela Canamar / SELINA TREVINO vs Minerva Santos / GABRIELA de LUNA6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAna Mancera / Amelie Jane vs Elsa Pena / SARA VILLARREAL6-0, 6-1
2026-04-18vs Laredo Team BWon 40
W#1 DoublesRaquel Gomez / Patricia Carranza vs Minerva Santos / Monica Mendoza6-0, 7-6
W#1 SinglesMaria Diez vs GABRIELA de LUNA6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMayela Saad / Sonia Pena vs Ana Alvarez / Olivia Gonzalez6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesPravina Mulchand / Minnie Dora Haynes Rodriguez vs Elsa Pena / Barbara Mendez6-3, 6-3
2026-04-15vs Laredo Team BWon 31
L#1 DoublesAna Mancera / Maria Diez vs Ana Alvarez / Olivia Gonzalez7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLizette Mora vs SARA VILLARREAL6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMelissa Ahumada / Pravina Mulchand vs Barbara Mendez / Elsa Pena6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSara Lascari / Raquel Gomez vs Monica Mendoza / Mirian Mendoza6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women's 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Laredo Team A501736105
2Laredo Team B0531735236

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Melissa Ahumada
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.80
SELINA TREVINO
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Raquel Gomez
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Ana Mancera
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.72
Patricia Carranza
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.70
Sara Lascari
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.67
Mayela Saad
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.63
Monica Acasuso
published
2.63
Maria Diez
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.62
Alice Werstak
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.58
Amelie Jane
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Lizette Mora
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Marisela Canamar
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Minnie Dora Haynes Rodriguez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Pravina Mulchand
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Sonia Pena
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Ahumada + Mayela Saad213 matchesnot enough data
Monica Acasuso + SELINA TREVINO213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melissa Ahumada
13W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.89
SELINA TREVINO
15W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
Raquel Gomez
11W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Ana Mancera
7W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Patricia Carranza
6W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.72
Sara Lascari
12W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70
Mayela Saad
6W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.67
Monica Acasuso
6W–9L career · no lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
2.63
Maria Diez
7W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
2.63
3
Alice Werstak
11W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
2.62
3
Amelie Jane
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
2.58
Lizette Mora
6W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Marisela Canamar
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Minnie Dora Haynes Rodriguez
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Pravina Mulchand
5W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sonia Pena
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.