Teams

BED:Zalegowski

2026 NH Adult 40 & Over Men · 4.5 Men 1

11 players · average NTRP 4.30 / NEW HAMPSHIRE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-12-21vs ALG:Bayer:GonzalesLost 12
L#1 DoublesScott Gale / Chris Zalegowski vs Chris Sporcic / Andrew Day1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJeff Monheit vs Blake Wayman1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesChad Connors / Drew Barwell vs Michael Bayer / Mark Blaisdell1-0
2025-11-09vs ALG:Bayer:GonzalesLost 03
L#1 DoublesChris Zalegowski / David Babbott-Klein vs Anthony Fernandez / John Prachar Jr1-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesAnand Killampalli Srinivasa vs Martin Morrissey1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJerry Knickerbocker / Jeff Monheit vs Mark Blaisdell / Chris Sporcic3-6, 4-6
2025-10-19vs ALG:Bayer:GonzalesLost 04
L#1 DoublesGlenn Peck / Jerry Knickerbocker vs Mark Blaisdell / David Taylor4-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesAnand Killampalli Srinivasa vs Blake Wayman1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPeter Samuelson / Curtis Hamilton vs Anthony Fernandez / Martin Morrissey1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesChris Zalegowski / Scott Gale vs Andrew Day / Chris Sporcic5-7, 5-7
2025-09-21vs ALG:Bayer:GonzalesLost 04
L#1 DoublesDavid Babbott-Klein / Glenn Peck vs Andrew Day / Tomas Gonzalez0-1
L#1 SinglesJeff Monheit vs David Taylor0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDrew Barwell / Chris Zalegowski vs John Prachar Jr / Michael Bayer4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAnand Killampalli Srinivasa / Peter Samuelson vs Mark Blaisdell / Brady Bartlett3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.5 Men 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ALG:Bayer:Gonzales04151371
2BED:Zalegowski0411530184

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.95 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.28
Scott Gale
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Chad Connors
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Curtis Hamilton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
David Babbott-Klein
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.06
Chris Zalegowski
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.97
Jeff Monheit
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.96
Jerry Knickerbocker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.88
Peter Samuelson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.87
Drew Barwell
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
3.80
Glenn Peck
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Anand Killampalli Srinivasa
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Glenn Peck + Curtis Hamilton314 matchesnot enough data
Drew Barwell + Chris Zalegowski134 matchesnot enough data
Scott Gale + Jerry Knickerbocker123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Scott Gale
24W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
4.28
4.5
Chad Connors
20W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
4.5
Curtis Hamilton
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
4.5
David Babbott-Klein
11W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Chris Zalegowski
37W–25L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
4.06
Jeff Monheit
15W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.97
Jerry Knickerbocker
88W–61L career · 2 lines in 2026
62%38%<1%
3.96
Peter Samuelson
173W–89L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.88
Drew Barwell
106W–46L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.87
Glenn Peck
18W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
92%8%<1%
3.80
4
Anand Killampalli Srinivasa
0W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.