Teams

PA Sanchez-Martin SSL A55-8.0W

2024 WMI SSL USTA League Adult 55&Over Weekday Leagues · WMI SSL A55&O 8.0 W (6 player)

12 players · average NTRP 3.90 / WESTERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-06-20vs MY Lancaster SSL A55-8.0WWon 20
W#1 DoublesChristine Hoeksema / Joan Hannadarrell vs Carol Heinicke / Susan Trillet7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRosemary Fiscus / Diana Smith vs Terri Beattie / Jackie Buck6-1, 6-3
2024-06-06vs MVC Wassenaar SSL A55-8.0WLost 02
L#1 DoublesKris Ponstine / Cynthia Papp vs Sharon Barnes / OPHIE FIX2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBeth Post / Gayl Kessel vs Elizabeth Antor / Karen Bell3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2024-05-30vs MVC Wassenaar SSL A55-8.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesLaurie Scott / Kris Ponstine vs Sharon Barnes / Molly McNamara1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBeth Post / Rosemary Fiscus vs Mary Muller / Elizabeth Antor3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesChristina Sanchez-Martin / Julie Gardzinski vs Sarah Williams / Stacy Ehrlich2-6, 1-6
2024-05-23vs MVC Wassenaar SSL A55-8.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesDiana Smith / Gayl Kessel vs Mary Muller / Elizabeth Antor2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKris Ponstine / Rosemary Fiscus vs Debbie Buchan / Molly McNamara1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesChristine Hoeksema / Joan Hannadarrell vs Sharon Barnes / Karen Bell3-6, 3-6
2024-05-16vs MY Lancaster SSL A55-8.0WWon 30
W#1 DoublesRosemary Fiscus / Beth Post vs Terri Beattie / Susan Trillet6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJoan Hannadarrell / Christina Sanchez-Martin vs Nancy McCune / Sarah Sandell6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLaurie Scott / Sherri Lawrence vs Betty Trebing / Karen Hoffman1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-04-18vs MVC Wassenaar SSL A55-8.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesRosemary Fiscus / Cynthia Papp vs Debbie Buchan / Molly McNamara0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBeth Post / Julie Gardzinski vs Sharon Barnes / Karen Bell4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJoan Hannadarrell / Kris Ponstine vs Mary Muller / Elizabeth Antor2-6, 4-6
2024-04-04vs MY Lancaster SSL A55-8.0WWon 21
L#1 DoublesGayl Kessel / Diana Smith vs Carol Heinicke / Sarah Sandell7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesChristina Sanchez-Martin / Sherri Lawrence vs Diane Dirette / Pamela Butt6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBeth Post / Rosemary Fiscus vs Betty Trebing / Glorianna Fogarty6-2, 6-4
2024-02-22vs MY Lancaster SSL A55-8.0WWon 21
L#1 DoublesKris Ponstine / Laurie Scott vs Terri Beattie / Jackie Buck0-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesGayl Kessel / Diana Smith vs Carol Heinicke / Denise Lancaster6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChristine Hoeksema / Julie Gardzinski vs Diane Dirette / Pamela Butt6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WMI SSL A55&O 8.0 W (6 player) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Beth Post
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
Diana Smith
published 4
3.67
Joan Hannadarrell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.64
Christine Hoeksema
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.53
Julie Gardzinski
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.50
Kris Ponstine
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.38
Cynthia Papp
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.36
Sherri Lawrence
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.33
Rosemary Fiscus
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.26
Gayl Kessel
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.17
Christina Sanchez-Martin
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
Laurie Scott
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gayl Kessel + Joan Hannadarrell3350% games+6.8% vs expected
Kris Ponstine + Christine Hoeksema4156% games+4.4% vs expected
Joan Hannadarrell + Christina Sanchez-Martin461357% games+3.3% vs expected
Rosemary Fiscus + Kris Ponstine121151% games+2.7% vs expected
Gayl Kessel + Julie Gardzinski9358% games+1.7% vs expected
Christine Hoeksema + Christina Sanchez-Martin7555% games+0.0% vs expected
Kris Ponstine + Sherri Lawrence2447% games−0.6% vs expected
Sherri Lawrence + Christina Sanchez-Martin10948% games−1.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Beth Post
105W–42L career · type A · 5 lines in 2024
<1%54%46%
3.99
4
Diana Smith
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Joan Hannadarrell
183W–116L career · 4 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Christine Hoeksema
58W–57L career · 3 lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.64
Julie Gardzinski
109W–63L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%42%58%
3.53
Kris Ponstine
112W–76L career · 5 lines in 2024
49%51%<1%
3.50
4
Cynthia Papp
69W–116L career · type A · 2 lines in 2024
80%20%<1%
3.38
Sherri Lawrence
77W–72L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
3.36
Rosemary Fiscus
70W–107L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%88%12%
3.33
Gayl Kessel
129W–140L career · 7 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Christina Sanchez-Martin
145W–126L career · 8 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
Laurie Scott
14W–21L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.