← Teams

SHC-Reimers

2020 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.56 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Michael Cobb
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.36
Eric Thompson
usually #2 Singles 57%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3.5
3.32
John van Leeuwen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Jason Hyde
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.31
Craig Hlady
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
—
Dan Bingham
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
—
Troy Johnston
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.99
Dan Wendling
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2020-03-08Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesDan Bingham / Dan Wendling vs Dinesh Jayaraj / Shanu Shaharuvan Sukoor6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesCraig Hlady vs NITIN Nair6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMichael Cobb / Jason Hyde vs Mosur Mohan / Nagaraj Sathyanarayan6-2, 6-4
2020-03-07Lost 1–4
L#1 DoublesCraig Hlady / John van Leeuwen vs Jeff Lipke / Jason Dortch6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesTroy Johnston vs Joey Lin6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDavid Butts / Jason Hyde vs Gabriel Weaver / Andrew Kitchen6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesEric Thompson vs Stefan Olander6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDan Bingham / Robert Wise vs Kerry Jantzi / Calee Cariaga6-4, 6-2
2020-02-23Won 4–1
W#1 DoublesTroy Johnston / Michael Cobb vs Andy LaFrazia / Ramon Tuason6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesEric Thompson vs Gregory Houlding6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJason Hyde / Robert Wise vs Patrick Clancy / Brian Eldridge7-6, 6-4
W#2 SinglesCraig Hlady vs Greg Mikol3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDavid Butts / Dan Wendling vs Doug Birch / Greg Brophy6-4, 6-4
2020-02-16Won 3–1
L#1 DoublesDan Bingham / John van Leeuwen vs Dan Wolff / David Pyle7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRobert Shevlin / Dan Wendling vs Paul Barner / Carl McConnell6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesTroy Johnston vs Tom Tsuruta6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJason Hyde / Ron Reimers vs George Husbands / James Stenger7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2020-02-09Split 2–2
W#1 SinglesMichael Cobb vs Jack Menashe6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRobert Shevlin / Dan Wendling vs Jeffrey Bayless / Matthew Casimo6-2, 7-6
L#2 SinglesEric Thompson vs Mark Meyer6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJason Hyde / Monte Roulier vs Chip Burczak / Pat Nevin3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2020-01-18Won 4–0
W#1 DoublesTroy Johnston / Eric Anderson vs Michael Gilbertson / Atul Bhargava6-0, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMichael Cobb vs Arjun Bilakanti6-1, 7-6
W#2 SinglesEric Thompson vs Nick Majmudar6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMonte Roulier / Jason Hyde vs Yogesh Patel / John Bergin6-1, 6-1
2020-01-11Split 1–1
L#1 SinglesTroy Johnston vs Ruslan Askarov2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCraig Hlady / John van Leeuwen vs Andy Bracken / Huy Bui5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2019-12-07Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesClark Cosart / Dan Wendling vs Charles Hahn / Kimbal Logan6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Michael Cobb
36W–22L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Eric Thompson
36W–26L career
0%95%4%
3.36
3.5
John van Leeuwen
55W–55L career
2%92%6%
3.32
3.5
Jason Hyde
53W–41L career
0%98%2%
3.32
3.5
Craig Hlady
44W–51L career
1%98%2%
3.31
3.5
Dan Bingham
46W–43L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Troy Johnston
55W–40L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Dan Wendling
52W–43L career
39%61%0%
2.99

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.