Teams

Hittin' It Hard

Spring Adult 18 & Over WeekDAY · Ladies 4.0 18s

18 players · average NTRP 3.80 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-10-25vs Berry Creek 4.0Split 22
L#1 DoublesJessica Buchanan / Anne Spross vs Shelley Moerbe / Amber Stephenson3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesTiffany Weigelt vs Wendy Moger6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesScarlet Hebert / Tina Bellings vs Karri Kallman / Tricia Richards3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSheri Memory / Jill Whitaker vs Terri Cowdrey / Amy Gantt2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-09-27vs Hit and RunWon 20
W#1 DoublesAmy Beauchamp / Sheri Memory vs Nicole Bell / Karen Shields6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTiffany Weigelt / Jessica Buchanan vs Mary Anne Clement / Marta Hotz7-6, 6-3
2023-09-13vs Danger ZoneWon 32
L#1 DoublesDawn Eckert / Anne Spross vs Barbara McGary / BIBIANA ECHEVERRY RAIGOZA3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesTina Bellings vs Alice Lu5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLori Barkley / Jill Whitaker vs Rhonda Worsham / Carol Bigart3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 SinglesTiffany Weigelt vs Estella Yanez6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesNikki Grossman / Tre' McCalister vs Rosandrys DeLeon / Mary Stephens6-2, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ladies 4.0 18s have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Tiffany Weigelt
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.71
Amy Beauchamp
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Amanda Teodecki
published 4
3.69
Tonya Frederic
published
3.62
Tina Bellings
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.58
Chanda Lor
published 4
3.52
Jessica Buchanan
published
3.49
Scarlet Hebert
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Susan Kinard
published
3.38
Tre' McCalister
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Anne Spross
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
Dawn Eckert
published 3.5
3.22
Melissa Cameron
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Rebecca Reese
published
Jill Whitaker
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Lori Barkley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Tammy McGahan
published
Vandy Malik
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anne Spross + Tina Bellings6260% games+14.4% vs expected
Amy Beauchamp + Tiffany Weigelt213049% games+0.8% vs expected
Jessica Buchanan + Amanda Teodecki3352% games+0.2% vs expected
Jessica Buchanan + Tiffany Weigelt5254% games−0.7% vs expected
Jill Whitaker + Tiffany Weigelt4257% games−0.8% vs expected
Jessica Buchanan + Dawn Eckert2444% games−2.3% vs expected
Amanda Teodecki + Amy Beauchamp6948% games−3.5% vs expected
Amanda Teodecki + Tiffany Weigelt5944% games−5.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tiffany Weigelt
65W–64L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
3.93
4
Amy Beauchamp
47W–70L career · 1 line in 2022
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Amanda Teodecki
27W–43L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
Tonya Frederic
7W–13L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Tina Bellings
32W–39L career · 4 lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
4
Chanda Lor
20W–36L career · no lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.58
Jessica Buchanan
25W–45L career · no lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
3.52
Scarlet Hebert
9W–20L career · 1 line in 2022
54%46%<1%
3.49
Susan Kinard
17W–44L career · no lines in 2022
65%35%<1%
3.45
Tre' McCalister
65W–53L career · 4 lines in 2022
82%18%<1%
3.38
3.5
Anne Spross
19W–32L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Dawn Eckert
16W–42L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Melissa Cameron
11W–30L career · 1 line in 2022
98%2%<1%
3.22
Rebecca Reese
16W–35L career · no lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.05
Jill Whitaker
14W–21L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lori Barkley
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Tammy McGahan
9W–15L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Vandy Malik
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.