Teams

GJTC NSNIDER

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - WS · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER - WS

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-25vs GJTC WSMITHWon 10
W#1 DoublesJordan Preuss / Michelle Eccles vs Lucy Sanders / Emma Wood6-0, 6-0
2023-05-18vs GJTC JHAGASplit 11
L#1 SinglesJordan Preuss vs Rachel Aiken0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesNatasha Snider / Michelle Eccles vs Susan Richardson / Kiri Woodmore7-6, 6-4
2023-05-11vs GJTC HBERGERWon 10
W#2 DoublesMichelle Eccles / Natasha Snider vs Rhonda DeLong / Nancy EISMEIER6-3, 6-1
2023-05-04vs GJTC LHILLANWon 10
W#1 SinglesJordan Preuss vs Megan Riveros6-3, 6-0
2023-04-27vs GJTC SHURTLost 01
L#1 DoublesJordan Preuss / Michelle Eccles vs Shelly Hurt / Valerie Lambdin4-6, 3-6
2023-04-20vs GJTC WSMITHLost 01
L#2 DoublesNatasha Snider / Michelle Eccles vs Jennifer Bradfield / Kelly Morse4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-04-13vs GJTC JHAGAWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichelle Eccles / Jordan Preuss vs Danika Holt / Susan Richardson6-1, 6-1
2023-04-06Won 10
W#3 DoublesJordan Preuss / Michelle Eccles vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER - WS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.11
Stephanie Bailey
published
3.05
Michelle Eccles
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.01
Jordan Preuss
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.87
Kimberly Langston
published
2.76
Melissa Reams
published
2.69
Kim Kintz
published
Debbie Sutherland
published 2.5
Natasha Snider
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Bailey + Melissa Reams6254% games−1.3% vs expected
Jordan Preuss + Michelle Eccles5266% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephanie Bailey
9W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%22%78%
3.11
3.5
Michelle Eccles
35W–34L career · 7 lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.05
3
Jordan Preuss
52W–39L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%47%53%
3.01
Kimberly Langston
22W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
2.87
Melissa Reams
18W–4L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%4%
2.76
Kim Kintz
10W–9L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
2.69
2.5
Debbie Sutherland
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Natasha Snider
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.