Teams

Wimberly - RS Clay

2023 Escambia Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 Combo 18 & Over - Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.70 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-12-14vs Tan - SHLWon 10
W#1 DoublesBonita Witkin / Anna Kreis vs Maria Hicks / Cherie Krohn6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2023-12-12vs Elliott - RS ClayWon 10
W#3 DoublesMecy Wimberly / Bonita Witkin vs Lauren Anderson / Leigh Clark5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2023-11-28vs Tan - SHLLost 02
L#2 DoublesChelsea Simpson / Mecy Wimberly vs Maria Hicks / Ive Marsach2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRenee Bradford / Jacqueline Wallace vs Cherie Tan / Shannon Schluter1-6, 2-6
2023-11-09vs Bryan - RS ClayLost 02
L#1 DoublesKelly Dempsey / Renee Bradford vs Amelia Gandy / Amy Harrison6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMecy Wimberly / Bonita Witkin vs Denise Wilson / Tammy Timby6-1, 6-7, 0-1
2023-10-26vs Covington - PCCWon 10
W#1 DoublesMecy Wimberly / Bonita Witkin vs Ashley Rasmussen / Tammy Crump6-1, 6-4
2023-10-19vs Elliott - RS ClayLost 01
L#2 DoublesRenee Bradford / Jacqueline Wallace vs Michelle Telhiard / Morgan Hofius2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Combo 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Renee Bradford
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.62
Bonita Witkin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.61
Angela Stewart
published 4
3.60
Kelly Dempsey
published
3.37
Chelsea Simpson
published 3.5
3.33
Anna Kreis
published 3.5
3.26
Jacqueline Wallace
published 3.5
3.24
Mecy Wimberly
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bonita Witkin + Mecy Wimberly2352% gamesnot enough data
Bonita Witkin + Renee Bradford134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Renee Bradford
134W–163L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Bonita Witkin
55W–66L career · 4 lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.62
4
Angela Stewart
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.61
Kelly Dempsey
4W–12L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.60
3.5
Chelsea Simpson
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Anna Kreis
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Jacqueline Wallace
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
2%95%3%
3.26
Mecy Wimberly
96W–91L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.24

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.