Teams

Bogen: BMW One Dubs

2026 ONE Doubles SPRING · 3.5 Men

3 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-04-30vs Nissen: Sub Zero 4.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesChristopher Bogen / Wade Martinson vs Todd Nissen / Brian Dahlin3-6, 0-6
2026-04-29vs Day/YeadonWon 10
W#1 DoublesChristopher Bogen / Wade Martinson vs Bradley Day / ZACHARY YEADON3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-04-15vs Lucas/ZukorWon 10
W#1 DoublesWade Martinson / Andrew Womeldorf vs Scott Lucas / Eli Zukor6-2, 6-1
2026-04-09vs Day/YeadonWon 10
W#1 DoublesChristopher Bogen / Andrew Womeldorf vs Bradley Day / ZACHARY YEADON6-0, 6-1
2026-04-01vs Nissen: Sub Zero 4.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesChristopher Bogen / Andrew Womeldorf vs Todd Nissen / Brian Dahlin2-6, 0-6
2026-03-25vs Lucas/ZukorWon 10
W#1 DoublesWade Martinson / Andrew Womeldorf vs Scott Lucas / Eli Zukor6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings19 teams · 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Nissen: Sub Zero 4.06060017
2Zamorano - Aces5050134
3Khan: Serve Bots4040124
4Pupp 1D 2026 Spring4040227
5Shen/Weinberg4141228
6Bogen: BMW One Dubs4242543
7Boese-B&W Ruff3131224
8Craig/McCormick3232539
9Jayswal: No Mercy Pushers2222442
10Hwang2222439
11Christiansen: Three and a Half Men2222541
12Fermstad: DjokoGOATs2222545
13Day/Yeadon2424859
14Price: DJMC1313640
15Rieck/Mattix1414849
16Lassow & Ted's Excellent Adventure1414854
17Schiller: Run BMC0404850
18Petersen0404848
19Lucas/Zukor06061272

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Andrew Womeldorf
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Wade Martinson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Christopher Bogen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wade Martinson + Christopher Bogen4351% games+0.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Andrew Womeldorf
14W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
3.49
Wade Martinson
34W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Christopher Bogen
21W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%86%14%
3.35

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.