Teams

PCC GREEN

2023 CTA WOMEN'S DAYTIME DOUBLES - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - DAYTIME

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-20vs SH BLUELost 01
L#1 DoublesTracy Nimmer / Renee Dyer vs Kristin Mccarty / Nora Dispense5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2023-06-13vs SKY REDWon 10
W#2 DoublesAmy Cook / Renee Dyer vs Candace Kristensson / Jenifer Marom6-3, 6-2
2023-06-06vs GAC GREENWon 20
W#1 DoublesErica Haycock / Renee Dyer vs Kris Stern / Gwen Hubbard6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMarti Longo / Patti Milhan vs Susan Kleimann / Allison Keefer6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2023-05-30vs VCC TEALWon 20
W#2 DoublesMarti Longo / Patti Milhan vs Julie Foreman / Paula Moore6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAmy Cook / Erica Haycock vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-05-23vs HW ORANGESplit 11
L#1 DoublesAmy Cook / Erica Haycock vs Jill Ellsworth / Bridgette Ward3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesPatti Milhan / Marti Longo vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-05-16vs PTC YELLOWWon 20
W#2 DoublesErica Haycock / Marti Longo vs Evelyn Snyder / Kathleen Bisaccia6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesPatti Milhan / Mary Jo Haw vs Hayley Servatius / Katy Cafazza6-3, 7-5
2023-05-09vs EM BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesErica Haycock / Amy Cook vs Lisa Ide / Kesa Sullivan3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesPatti Milhan / Mary Jo Haw vs Andrea Lauricella / Jane Morrissey6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.60 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Colette Mitchell
published 3
2.86
Amy Cook
published 3
2.72
Erica Haycock
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.71
Renee Dyer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.50
Patti Milhan
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.36
Tracy Nimmer
published
2.32
Marti Longo
published
2.27
Mary Jo Haw
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Renee Dyer + Amy Cook5254% games+6.1% vs expected
Erica Haycock + Renee Dyer4457% games+5.8% vs expected
Patti Milhan + Erica Haycock314 matchesnot enough data
Patti Milhan + Renee Dyer404 matchesnot enough data
Erica Haycock + Amy Cook213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Colette Mitchell
4W–0L career · no lines in 2023
<1%24%76%
3.10
3
Amy Cook
20W–12L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%15%
2.86
3
Erica Haycock
40W–31L career · 5 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Renee Dyer
80W–48L career · 3 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Patti Milhan
52W–47L career · type A · 5 lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
2.50
Tracy Nimmer
7W–12L career · no lines in 2023
84%16%<1%
2.36
Marti Longo
12W–14L career · no lines in 2023
90%10%<1%
2.32
Mary Jo Haw
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
95%5%<1%
2.27

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.