Teams

DDemaine (Queens)

2022 Mixed Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Mixed 7.0 - Mon PM

9 players · average NTRP 3.70 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-08-08vs TSemones (OPRC)Won 10
W#3 DoublesDevon DeMaine / SJ Pragasam vs Sandra Troni / Rodrigo Troni6-1, 6-0
2022-08-02Won 10
W#3 DoublesPaula Donoghue / Rakesh Kumar Vojjini vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-08-01vs BSheppard (Raintree)Split 11
L#2 DoublesDevon DeMaine / Kanika Raja vs Bonnie Sheppard / Nevin Sheppard3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPaula Donoghue / Mark Evans vs John Shaw / Tricia Shaw6-0, 6-0
2022-07-26Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDevon DeMaine / Donna Musante vs Cecilia Drake / Benjamin Lescot2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-07-18vs GJones/MWilt (Queens)Won 20
W#1 DoublesPaula Donoghue / Rakesh Kumar Vojjini vs Will Foster / Emma Schaafsma6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesDevon DeMaine / SJ Pragasam vs Max Moore / Pallavi Kenkare6-1, 6-1
2022-07-11vs JDichak/VKoskinas (Weddington)Won 10
W#2 DoublesPaula Donoghue / Rakesh Kumar Vojjini vs Dawn Castain / Michael Rousseaux6-1, 6-2
2022-06-27Won 10
W#2 DoublesDevon DeMaine / Stacey Brown vs Bilan Mo / Jarrett Meadors4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-06-20Lost 01
L#3 DoublesDevon DeMaine / Paula Donoghue vs Amanda Patrocino / Martin Palmeri3-6, 4-6
2022-06-13vs KCronin/AFink (Piper Glen)Won 10
W#3 DoublesDevon DeMaine / Donna Musante vs Stephanie Rock / Bryan Newsome6-2, 6-2
2022-05-30vs SCage/MParker (Queens)Won 10
W#2 DoublesDevon DeMaine / Donna Musante vs Stefanie Cage / Patrick Wells6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Mixed 7.0 - Mon PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Cameron Lober
published 4
3.70
3.69
Devon DeMaine
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.51
Paula Donoghue
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.48
Kanika Raja
published
3.43
Donna Musante
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.42
Brian Martens
published 3.5
3.22
SJ Pragasam
published
Jim Yablonski
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Devon DeMaine + Donna Musante6165% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cameron Lober
15W–7L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
Rakesh Kumar Vojjini
36W–30L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Devon DeMaine
96W–41L career · 8 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
3.5
Paula Donoghue
189W–116L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%47%53%
3.51
Kanika Raja
8W–10L career · no lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
3.48
3.5
Donna Musante
353W–176L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Brian Martens
16W–17L career · no lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.42
SJ Pragasam
17W–32L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
Jim Yablonski
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.