Teams

ET-Tanca

2025 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 2.86 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Abhisar Gupta
published 3
2.90
Andrew Kullick
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.74
Hao Lee
published 3
2.58
Zak Kapla
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.56
Rutvij Desai
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.48
Paul Choi
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Walter Schwane
published 2.5
Results5 ties
2025-06-07Lost 02
L#1 DoublesKavan Puranik / Zak Kapla vs Will Bayon / Matt Vuylsteke6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDavid Stormo / Rutvij Desai vs David Huang / Douglas Bennett7-6, 6-3
2025-05-25Lost 02
L#1 DoublesRutvij Desai / Zak Kapla vs Mark Hopkins / Matt Asay6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesPaul Choi / Jay Waters vs Alvin Lym / Danny Tran6-0, 6-2
2025-05-17Lost 12
L#1 DoublesRutvij Desai / Kavan Puranik vs Jason Floyd / Ian Schnadig6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKevin Segal / Zak Kapla vs Jered Cuenco / Sven Louis6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesHao Lee / Andrew Kullick vs Douglas Bennett / Sam Habibi6-2, 6-1
2025-04-27Lost 01
L#1 DoublesPaul Choi / Andrew Kullick vs Monte Gonzales / John Brady7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-04-13Lost 02
L#1 DoublesAndrew Kullick / Travis Hendricks vs Amir Hanania / James Trolio6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesPaul Choi / Robert Hawkins vs Michael Barrantes / Michael Rich6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Abhisar Gupta
29W–22L career
0%44%56%
3.13
3
Andrew Kullick
19W–14L career
0%88%12%
2.90
3
Hao Lee
23W–32L career
2%98%0%
2.74
3
Zak Kapla
20W–26L career
13%87%0%
2.58
3
Rutvij Desai
6W–18L career · type A
23%77%0%
2.56
2.5
Paul Choi
16W–18L career
0%42%58%
2.48
2.5
Walter Schwane
20W–38L career
not enough data

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.