Teams

The Volliers

2021 Fredericksburg Adult 18 & Over Spring · Fredericksburg Adult 18 & Over Women 4.0

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2021-06-12Won 10
W#3 DoublesBrooke Heiken / Mae King vs Cynthia Goforth / Lana King6-1, 6-4
2021-06-06vs LoveOrMoneyWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrooke Heiken / Meg Bohmke vs Julie Root / Lana King6-3, 6-0
2021-05-23vs LoveOrMoneyWon 20
W#1 DoublesPamela Ryon / Susan Spector vs Katie Leimbach / Shaun Sullivan4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMeg Bohmke / Denise Wetherington vs Julie Root / Marla Aste6-2, 6-1
2021-05-22Won 20
W#1 DoublesBrooke Heiken / Marie Taylor vs Anne Truong / Cynthia Goforth6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMeg Bohmke / Denise Wetherington vs Bobbi Shoop / Deborah McFann6-3, 6-1
2021-05-16vs LoveOrMoneyWon 20
W#1 DoublesBrooke Heiken / Margaret Denue vs Katie Leimbach / Shaun Sullivan3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMeg Bohmke / Mae King vs Marla Aste / Cynthia Goforth6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2021-05-08vs LoveOrMoneyWon 20
W#1 DoublesMae King / Brooke Heiken vs Anne Truong / Shaun Sullivan6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesDorota Sipko / Meg Bohmke vs Cynthia Goforth / Katie Leimbach6-2, 6-2
2021-04-18Won 10
W#2 DoublesMeg Bohmke / Dorota Sipko vs Theresa Dressler / Lana King6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2021-04-17vs LoveOrMoneyWon 10
W#1 DoublesSusan Spector / Pamela Ryon vs Cynthia Goforth / Katie Leimbach4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2021-04-10vs LoveOrMoneyWon 20
W#1 DoublesBrooke Heiken / Meg Bohmke vs Anne Truong / Dana Schuster6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesPamela Ryon / Susan Spector vs Julie Root / Deborah McFann6-2, 6-4
2021-03-28vs LoveOrMoneyWon 20
W#1 DoublesBrooke Heiken / Marie Taylor vs Bobbi Shoop / Katie Leimbach6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesPamela Ryon / Susan Spector vs Julie Root / Lorrie Roberts6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fredericksburg Adult 18 & Over Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Brooke Heiken
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 4.5
3.89
Marie Taylor
published
3.82
Meg Bohmke
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.75
Amy French
published 4
3.53
Susan Spector
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.31
Dorota Sipko
published 3.5
Susan Thompson
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brooke Heiken
170W–83L career · 7 lines in 2021
19%81%<1%
4.12
Marie Taylor
16W–18L career · no lines in 2021
80%20%<1%
3.89
Meg Bohmke
26W–13L career · 7 lines in 2021
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Amy French
6W–4L career · type A · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Susan Spector
321W–248L career · 4 lines in 2021
40%60%<1%
3.53
3.5
Dorota Sipko
163W–91L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.31
Susan Thompson
2W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.